Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30909924›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2019

Use and retention of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) in a malaria risk area in the Brazilian Amazon: a 5-year follow-up intervention.

Jessica de Oliveira Sousa, Bernardino Claudio de Albuquerque, José Rodrigues Coura, Martha Cecilia Suárez-Mutis

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Behavioural responses ofCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jessica de Oliveira SousaLaboratory of Parasitic Diseases, Institute Oswaldo Cruz/Fiocruz, Av Brasil 4365. Pavilhão Artur Neiva, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP: 21040-900, Brazil. jessicaosousabio@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3240-191X
Bernardino Claudio de AlbuquerqueFoundation of Health Surveillance of Amazonas, Av. Torquato Tapajós, 4.010, Colônia Santo Antônio, Manaus, AM, CEP 69.093-018, Brazil.
José Rodrigues CouraLaboratory of Parasitic Diseases, Institute Oswaldo Cruz/Fiocruz, Av Brasil 4365. Pavilhão Artur Neiva, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP: 21040-900, Brazil.
Martha Cecilia Suárez-MutisLaboratory of Parasitic Diseases, Institute Oswaldo Cruz/Fiocruz, Av Brasil 4365. Pavilhão Artur Neiva, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, CEP: 21040-900, Brazil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz · BR

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (BR) Edital Universal/Process: 485230/2011-9Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior Financial Code 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLong-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) are one of the main vector control strategies recommended by the World Health Organization for the control and elimination of malaria. This study aimed to evaluate the use and retention of LLINs during the 5 years of implementing an integrated control strategy in a malaria-endemic area in the Brazilian Amazon.

methodsThis intervention study was conducted in localities of the municipality of Barcelos, Amazonas, from 2008 to 2014. Four rural localities situated along the Padauiri River were the object of this study. Two localities (Bacabal-rio Aracá and the São Sebastião district) were used as controls. LLINs were distributed to all residents of the Padauiri River; assessments were made regarding their use and retention via a semistructured questionnaire, a household register, and direct observation during 5 years.

resultsOverall, 208 individuals participated in the study. In the baseline pilot study (2008), 9.9% of the subjects in the intervention group had slept with mosquito nets the previous night compared with 37.8% of the subjects in the control group. In 2010, this percentage was 43.2% in the intervention group and 50.9% in the control group. Therefore, 1 year after the implementation of the strategy, although there was an increase in the use of mosquito nets in both groups, this increase was significantly higher in the intervention group. This increase in LLINs use did not persist after 5 years of intervention. The households' evaluation in 2014 showed that 80% of the houses in the intervention group owned at least one LLIN compared with 66% in the control group (p = 0.11); 76% of households in the intervention group owned sufficient LLINs for all family members compared with 50% in the control group (p = 0.007).

conclusionsHigh ownership and retention of the LLINs was observed in the intervention group. At 1 year after the distribution of these LLINs, there was a significant increase in their use that was not maintained over the long term. Control strategies must be permanent; however, exploring new strategies is necessary to ensure that the knowledge acquired further modifies the attitudes and behaviours.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBrazilFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInsecticide-Treated BednetsMalariaMaleMiddle AgedMosquito ControlPilot ProjectsRural PopulationSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultControlEliminationLLINsMalariaRetentionUse

Identifiers

PMID30909924
PMCPMC6434793
OpenAlexW2940341143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.