Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30909407›Full record

ReviewAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2019

Review of Sensor Technologies in Animal Breeding: Phenotyping Behaviors of Laying Hens to Select Against Feather Pecking.

Esther D Ellen, Malou van der Sluis, Janice Siegford, Oleksiy Guzhva, Michael J Toscano, Jörn Bennewitz, Lisette E van der Zande, Jerine A J van der Eijk, Elske N de Haas, Tomas Norton and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Digital Phenotyping: A Game Changer for the Broiler Industry.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Relationships between Damaging Behaviours and Health in Laying Hens.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Esther D EllenAnimal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands. esther.ellen@wur.nl.ORCID 0000-0001-7306-4468
Malou van der SluisAnimal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands. malou.vandersluis@wur.nl.
Janice SiegfordAnimal Behavior and Welfare Group, Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA. siegford@msu.edu.
Oleksiy GuzhvaDepartment Biosystems and Technology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 230 53 Alnarp, Sweden. oleksiy.guzhva@slu.se.ORCID 0000-0002-0703-9894
Michael J ToscanoCenter for Proper Housing: Poultry and Rabbits University of Bern, CH 3052 Zollikofen, Switzerland. michael.toscano@vetsuisse.unibe.ch.
Jörn BennewitzInstitute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany. j.bennewitz@uni-hohenheim.de.
Lisette E van der ZandeAdaptation Physiology Group, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands. lisette.vanderzande@wur.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-6506-6591
Jerine A J van der EijkAdaptation Physiology Group, Wageningen University & Research, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands. jerine.vandereijk@wur.nl.
Elske N de HaasDepartment of Animals in Science and Society, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, 3508 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands. e.n.dehaas@uu.nl.
Tomas NortonM3-BIORES, Division Animal and Human Health Engineering, Department of Biosystems, KU Leuven, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium. tomas.norton@kuleuven.be.ORCID 0000-0002-0161-3189
Deborah PietteM3-BIORES, Division Animal and Human Health Engineering, Department of Biosystems, KU Leuven, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium. deborah.piette@kuleuven.be.ORCID 0000-0002-2940-5031
Jens TetensFunctional Breeding Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Georg-August University, 37077 Göttingen, Germany. jens.tetens@uni-goettingen.de.ORCID 0000-0001-5352-464X
Britt de KlerkCobb Europe, 5831 GH Boxmeer, The Netherlands. Britt.deKlerk@cobb-europe.com.
Bram VisserHendrix Genetics Research, Technology & Services B.V., 5830 AC Boxmeer, The Netherlands. Bram.Visser@hendrix-genetics.com.
T Bas RodenburgDepartment of Animals in Science and Society, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, 3508 TD Utrecht, The Netherlands. t.b.rodenburg@uu.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-3371-1461

Funding

European Cooperation in Science and Technology CA 15134 GroupHouseNetMinisterie van Economische Zaken TKI-AF12018National Institute of Food and Agriculture 1002990National Institute of Food and Agriculture 1010765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Damaging behaviors, like feather pecking (FP), have large economic and welfare consequences in the commercial laying hen industry. Selective breeding can be used to obtain animals that are less likely to perform damaging behavior on their pen-mates. However, with the growing tendency to keep birds in large groups, identifying specific birds that are performing or receiving FP is difficult. With current developments in sensor technologies, it may now be possible to identify laying hens in large groups that show less FP behavior and select them for breeding. We propose using a combination of sensor technology and genomic methods to identify feather peckers and victims in groups. In this review, we will describe the use of "-omics" approaches to understand FP and give an overview of sensor technologies that can be used for animal monitoring, such as ultra-wideband, radio frequency identification, and computer vision. We will then discuss the identification of indicator traits from both sensor technologies and genomics approaches that can be used to select animals for breeding against damaging behavior.

Indexed as

computer visiondamaging behaviorgenetic selectionidentificationmeasuring behavior-omicsradio frequency identificationultra-wideband

Identifiers

PMID30909407
PMCPMC6466287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.