Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30909378›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2019

Rethinking the Dental Amalgam Dilemma: An Integrated Toxicological Approach.

Hector Jirau-Colón, Leonardo González-Parrilla, Jorge Martinez-Jiménez, Waldemar Adam, Braulio Jiménez-Velez

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Applications of Antioxidants in Dental Procedures.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hector Jirau-ColónDepartment of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences Campus, University of Puerto Rico, Main Building B210, San Juan 00936, Puerto Rico. hector.jirau@upr.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5531-6350
Leonardo González-ParrillaDepartment of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences Campus, University of Puerto Rico, Main Building B210, San Juan 00936, Puerto Rico. leonardo.gonzalez2@upr.edu.
Jorge Martinez-JiménezDepartment of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences Campus, University of Puerto Rico, Main Building B210, San Juan 00936, Puerto Rico. jorge.martinez20@upr.edu.
Waldemar AdamDepartment of Chemistry, Rio Piedras Campus, University of Puerto Rico, Av. Dr. José N. Gándara, San Juan 00936, Puerto Rico. wadam@chemie.uni-wuerzburg.de.
Braulio Jiménez-VelezDepartment of Biochemistry, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences Campus, University of Puerto Rico, Main Building B210, San Juan 00936, Puerto Rico. braulio.jimenez@upr.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7878-769X
University of Puerto Rico, Medical Sciences Campus · PRUniversity of Puerto Rico at Río Piedras · PR

Funding

Upstream Regulation and Downstream effectors of c-MYC in Ovarian CancerU54MD007600 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO MED SCIENCES · PI Abiel Roche-Lima · 2017 to 2026
$35.8M
RISE Option III: MBRS RISE at the UPR Medical Sciences CampusR25GM061838 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO MED SCIENCES · PI CADILLA, CARMEN LYDIA · 2000 to 2021
$25.5M
MBRS Research Initiative for Scientific Enhancement (RISE) R25GM061838NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM061838NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD007600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mercury (Hg) has been identified as one of the most toxic nonradioactive materials known to man. Although mercury is a naturally occurring element, anthropogenic mercury is now a major worldwide concern and is an international priority toxic pollutant. It also comprises one of the primary constituents of dental amalgam fillings. Even though dental mercury amalgams have been used for almost two centuries, its safety has never been tested or proven in the United States by any regulatory agency. There has been an ongoing debate regarding the safety of its use since 1845, and many studies conclude that its use exposes patients to troublesome toxicity. In this review, we present in an objective way the danger of dental amalgam to human health based on current knowledge. This dilemma is addressed in terms of an integrated toxicological approach by focusing on four mayor issues to show how these interrelate to create the whole picture: (1) the irrefutable constant release of mercury vapor from dental amalgams which is responsible for individual chronic exposure, (2) the evidence of organic mercury formation from dental amalgam in the oral cavity, (3) the effect of mercury exposure on gene regulation in human cells which supports the intrinsic genetic susceptibility to toxicant and, finally, (4) the availability of recent epidemiological data supporting the link of dental amalgams to diseases such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson.

Indexed as

Dental AmalgamHumansMercuryUnited StatesDental AmalgamMercurydental amalgammercurymethylmercuryoral toxicologyrestorative dentistrytoxic metals

Identifiers

PMID30909378
PMCPMC6466133
OpenAlexW2923444629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.