Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30908803›Full record

ArticleNMR in biomedicine2019

Histologically derived fiber response functions for diffusion MRI vary across white matter fibers-An ex vivo validation study in the squirrel monkey brain.

Kurt G Schilling, Yurui Gao, Iwona Stepniewska, Vaibhav Janve, Bennett A Landman, Adam W Anderson

Open access · greenAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in NMR in biomedicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Fiber orientation distribution from diffusion MRI: Effects of inaccurate response function calibration.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kurt G SchillingVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3686-7645
Yurui GaoVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Iwona StepniewskaDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Vaibhav JanveVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Bennett A LandmanVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Adam W AndersonVanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Vanderbilt University · US

Funding

Postdoctoral Training in Biomedical MRI and MRST32EB001628 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI John C Gore · 2003 to 2026
$7.0M
The Biological Basis of Diffusion MRI of the BrainR01NS058639 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI ANDERSON, ADAM W · 2008 to 2016
$3.7M
LSM880-Airyscan Confocal Microscope for Large Shared ResourceS10OD021630 · OD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI WELLS, K. SAM · 2016 to 2016
$560k
Confocal Microscope for Live Embryo Imaging in a Shared Resource FacilityS10RR027396 · NCRR · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI PRINCE, LAWRENCE S · 2010 to 2010
$460k
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke of the National Institutes of Health RO1 NS058639National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke of the National Institutes of Health S10 RR17799National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke of the National Institutes of Health T32EB001628NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR027396NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB001628NIH HHS S10 OD021630NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS058639
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the relationship between the diffusion-weighted MRI signal and the arrangement of white matter fibers is fundamental for accurate voxel-wise reconstruction of the fiber orientation distribution (FOD) and subsequent fiber tractography. Spherical deconvolution reconstruction techniques model the diffusion signal as the convolution of the FOD with a response function that represents the signal profile of a single fiber orientation. Thus, given the signal and a fiber response function, the FOD can be estimated in every imaging voxel by deconvolution. However, the selection of the appropriate response function remains relatively under-studied, and requires further validation. In this work, using 3D histologically defined FODs and the corresponding diffusion signal from three ex vivo squirrel monkey brains, we derive the ground truth response functions. We find that the histologically derived response functions differ from those conventionally used. Next, we find that response functions statistically vary across brain regions, which suggests that the practice of using the same kernel throughout the brain is not optimal. We show that different kernels lead to different FOD reconstructions, which in turn can lead to different tractography results depending on algorithmic parameters, with large variations in the accuracy of resulting reconstructions. Together, these results suggest there is room for improvement in estimating and understanding the relationship between the diffusion signal and the underlying FOD.

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingAlgorithmsAnimalsDiffusion Tensor ImagingSaimiriWhite Matterdiffusion MRIHARDIhistologyresponse functionspherical deconvolutiontractography

Identifiers

PMID30908803
PMCPMC6525086
OpenAlexW2953025698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.