Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30908756›Full record

ArticleJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV2019

Port wine stain treatment outcomes have not improved over the past three decades.

M I van Raath, S Chohan, A Wolkerstorfer, C M A M van der Horst, G Storm, M Heger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Photo-Mediated Ultrasound Therapy (PUT) for the Treatment of Deep Cutaneous Vasculature.IEEE open journal of ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Port Wine Birthmark Therapy: A New Direction.Lasers in surgery and medicine · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M I van RaathDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Medicine, Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, China.
S ChohanDepartment of Experimental Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
A WolkerstorferDepartment of Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
C M A M van der HorstDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive, and Hand Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
G StormDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
M HegerDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Medicine, Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, China.

Funding

Academic Medical Center SKE Fund 20090812Stichting Technologische Wetenschap 12064
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince the early '80s, the pulsed dye laser has been the standard treatment tool for non-invasive port wine stain (PWS) removal. In the last three decades, a considerable amount of research has been conducted to improve clinical outcomes, given that a fraction of PWS patients proved recalcitrant to laser treatment. Whether this research actually led to increased therapeutic efficacy has not been systematically investigated.

objectiveTo analyse therapeutic efficacy in PWS patients globally from 1986 to date.

methodsPubMed was searched for all available PWS trials. Studies with a quartile percentage improvement scale were included, analysed and plotted chronologically. Treatment and patient characteristics were extracted. A mean clearance per study was calculated and plotted. A 5-study simple moving average was co-plotted to portray the trend in mean clearance over time. The data were separately analysed for multiple treatment sessions in previously untreated patients.

resultsSixty-five studies were included (24.3% of eligible studies) comprising 6207 PWS patients. Of all patients, 21% achieved 75-100% clearance. Although a few studies reported remarkably good outcomes in a subset of carefully selected patients, there was no upward trend over time in mean clearance.

conclusionThe efficacy of PWS therapy has not improved in the past decades, despite numerous technical innovations and pharmacological interventions. With an unwavering patient demand for better outcomes, the need for development and implementation of novel therapeutic strategies to clear all PWS is as valid today as it was 30 years ago.

Indexed as

HumansLasers, DyeLaser TherapyPhotochemotherapyPort-Wine StainTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID30908756
PMCPMC6618082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.