ArticleThe Laryngoscope2020
Chemical receptors of the arytenoid: A comparison of human and mouse.
Article in The Laryngoscope, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Structural comparisons of human and mouse fungiform taste buds.Chemical senses · 2025Article
- Structural comparisons of human and mouse fungiform taste buds.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Examining the Influence of Chemosensation on Laryngeal Health and Disorders.Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2023Review
- Localization of TRPV3/4 and PIEZO1/2 sensory receptors in murine and human larynges.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2022Article
- Are Multiple Chemosensory Systems Accountable for COVID-19 Outcome?Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Cellular Diversity and Regeneration in Taste Buds.Current opinion in physiology · 2021Article
- Sensory Innervation of the Larynx and the Search for Mucosal Mechanoreceptors.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2021Article
- Laryngeal Chemoreflex in Health and Disease: A Review.Chemical senses · 2020Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectives/hypothesisThe larynx is a highly responsive organ exposed to mechanical, thermal, and chemical stimuli. Chemicals elicit responses both in intraepithelial nerve fibers and in specialized chemosensory cells, including scattered solitary cells as well as taste cells organized into taste buds. Activation of both chemosensory cells and taste buds in the larynx elicit cough, swallow, or apnea with exposure to sour or bitter substances, and even by water or sweet-tasting chemicals. In an effort to begin understanding their function, we sought to compare the distribution, density, and types of chemosensory cells and chemoresponsive nerve fibers in laryngeal epithelium of humans and mice. STUDY
designAnimal and human laboratory analysis.
methodsUsing immunohistochemistry, we identified taste cells and polymodal nociceptive nerve fibers in the arytenoid area of the laryngeal epithelium of the following: 1) infants undergoing supraglottoplasty for laryngomalacia, and 2) a cadaveric specimen procured from a 34-year-old donor. We then compared these findings to both preweanling and mature mouse tissue.
resultsArytenoid tissue from both human and mouse contained many taste buds containing type II taste cells-bitter, sweet, or umami sensing-which were innervated by nerve fibers expressing P2X3 type adenosine triphosphate receptors. Type III cells (acid responsive) were also present, but they were fewer in human tissue than in equivalent tissue from mice. In both species, the epithelium was densely innervated by free nerve endings.
conclusionsOur findings suggest that from a standpoint of chemosensation, human and mouse larynges are biologically similar. This suggests that a murine model can be used effectively in laryngeal chemosensory research. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 130:423-430, 2020.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.