Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30908629›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2019

Neurons of the inferior olive respond to broad classes of sensory input while subject to homeostatic control.

Chiheng Ju, Laurens W J Bosman, Tycho M Hoogland, Arthiha Velauthapillai, Pavithra Murugesan, Pascal Warnaar, Romano M van Genderen, Mario Negrello, Chris I De Zeeuw

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Consensus Paper: Models of Cerebellar Functions.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cerebellar control of targeted tongue movements.The Journal of physiology · 2025
    Article
  12. Control of tongue movements by the Purkinje cells of the cerebellum.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Developmentally Unique Cerebellar Processing Prioritizes Self- over Other-Generated Movements.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  15. The olivary input to the cerebellum dissociates sensory events from movement plans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chiheng JuDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Laurens W J BosmanDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9497-0566
Tycho M HooglandDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7444-9279
Arthiha VelauthapillaiDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Pavithra MurugesanDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Pascal WarnaarDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Romano M van GenderenDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Mario NegrelloDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8527-4259
Chris I De ZeeuwDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5628-8187
Erasmus MC · NLNetherlands Institute for Neuroscience · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key pointsPurkinje cells in the cerebellum integrate input from sensory organs with that from premotor centres. Purkinje cells use a variety of sensory inputs relaying information from the environment to modify motor control. Here we investigated to what extent the climbing fibre inputs to Purkinje cells signal mono- or multi-sensory information, and to what extent this signalling is subject to recent history of activity. We show that individual climbing fibres convey multiple types of sensory information, together providing a rich mosaic projection pattern of sensory signals across the cerebellar cortex. Moreover, firing probability of climbing fibres following sensory stimulation depends strongly on the recent history of activity, showing a tendency to homeostatic dampening. ABSTRACT: Cerebellar Purkinje cells integrate sensory information with motor efference copies to adapt movements to behavioural and environmental requirements. They produce complex spikes that are triggered by the activity of climbing fibres originating in neurons of the inferior olive. These complex spikes can shape the onset, amplitude and direction of movements and the adaptation of such movements to sensory feedback. Clusters of nearby inferior olive neurons project to parasagittally aligned stripes of Purkinje cells, referred to as 'microzones'. It is currently unclear to what extent individual Purkinje cells within a single microzone integrate climbing fibre inputs from multiple sources of different sensory origins, and to what extent sensory-evoked climbing fibre responses depend on the strength and recent history of activation. Here we imaged complex spike responses in cerebellar lobule crus 1 to various types of sensory stimulation in awake mice. We find that different sensory modalities and receptive fields have a mild, but consistent, tendency to converge on individual Purkinje cells, with climbing fibres showing some degree of input-specificity. Purkinje cells encoding the same stimulus show increased events with coherent complex spike firing and tend to lie close together. Moreover, whereas complex spike firing is only mildly affected by variations in stimulus strength, it depends strongly on the recent history of climbing fibre activity. Our data point towards a mechanism in the olivo-cerebellar system that regulates complex spike firing during mono- or multi-sensory stimulation around a relatively low set-point, highlighting an integrative coding scheme of complex spike firing under homeostatic control.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsFeedback, SensoryAnimalsMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLOlivary NucleusPurkinje CellsTouch PerceptionVibrissaecerebellumclimbing fibrehomeostatic mechanismsinferior olivePurkinje cellsensory integration

Identifiers

PMID30908629
PMCPMC6487939
OpenAlexW2952927654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.