Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30908381›Full record

SynthesisMedical care2019

A Meta-Analysis of the Associations Between the Nurse Work Environment in Hospitals and 4 Sets of Outcomes.

Eileen T Lake, Jordan Sanders, Rui Duan, Kathryn A Riman, Kathryn M Schoenauer, Yong Chen

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medical care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 172 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
172citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

172 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Identifying Elements of a School Nurse's Work Environment That Are Salient to Their Job Outcomes: A Scoping Review.The Journal of school nursing : the official publication of the National Association of School Nurses · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

112 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eileen T LakeCenter for Health Outcomes and Policy Research, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA.
Jordan SandersUniversity of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, VT.
Rui DuanCenter for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
Kathryn A RimanCenter for Health Outcomes and Policy Research, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA.
Kathryn M SchoenauerCenter for Health Outcomes and Policy Research, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA.
Yong ChenCenter for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.

Funding

ADVANCED TRAINING IN NURSING OUTCOMES RESEARCHT32NR007104 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI JACQUELINE MARGO BROOKS CARTHON, EILEEN T LAKE · 1999 to 2026
$11.6M
Dynamic learning for post-vaccine event prediction using temporal information in VAERSR01AI130460 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI CHEN, YONG, TAO, CUI · 2017 to 2021
$3.4M
A General Framework to Account for Outcome Reporting Bias in Systematic ReviewsR01LM012607 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CHEN, YONG · 2017 to 2020
$1.4M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI130460NINR NIH HHS T32 NR007104NLM NIH HHS R01 LM012607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe nurse work environment is theorized to influence the quality of nursing care, nurse job outcomes, and patient outcomes.

objectiveThe aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate quantitatively the association of the work environment with job and health outcomes. RESEARCH

designRelevant studies published through September 2018 were identified. Inclusion criteria were use of a nationally endorsed work environment measure and reporting of odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals from regression models of 4 outcome classes: nurse job outcomes, safety and quality ratings, patient outcomes, and patient satisfaction. Pooled ORs and confidence intervals were estimated for each outcome using fixed or random effects models. SUBJECTS: Of 308 articles reviewed, 40 met inclusion criteria. After excluding 23 due to sample overlap or too few observations to meta-analyze, a set of 17 articles, comprising 21 independent samples, was analyzed. Cumulatively, these articles reported data from 2677 hospitals, 141 nursing units, 165,024 nurses, and 1,368,420 patients, in 22 countries. MEASURES: Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index, a National Quality Forum nursing care performance standard.

resultsConsistent, significant associations between the work environment and all outcome classes were identified. Better work environments were associated with lower odds of negative nurse outcomes (average OR of 0.71), poor safety or quality ratings (average OR of 0.65), and negative patient outcomes (average OR of 0.93), but higher odds of patient satisfaction (OR of 1.16).

conclusionsThe nurse work environment warrants attention to promote health care quality, safety, and patient and clinician well-being.

Indexed as

WorkplaceHumansJob SatisfactionNursing Staff, HospitalOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient SafetyPatient SatisfactionQuality of Health Care

Identifiers

PMID30908381
PMCPMC6615025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.