Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30908308›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational gastroenterology2019

Noninvasive Diagnosis of Irritable Bowel Syndrome via Bowel Sound Features: Proof of Concept.

Xuhao Du, Gary Allwood, K Mary Webberley, Andrisha-Jade Inderjeeth, Adam Osseiran, Barry James Marshall

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. [Snoring noise removal method for bowel sound signal during sleep].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Automated Bowel Sound Analysis: An Overview.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Xuhao DuMarshall Centre, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Gary AllwoodMarshall Centre, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
K Mary WebberleyMarshall Centre, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Andrisha-Jade InderjeethNorth Metropolitan Health Service, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Adam OsseiranSchool of Engineering, Edith Cowan University, Western Australia, Australia.
Barry James MarshallMarshall Centre, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
University of Western Australia · AUEdith Cowan University · AUNorth Metropolitan Health Service · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIrritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common and debilitating disorder estimated to affect approximately 11% of the world's population. Typically, IBS is a diagnosis of exclusion after patients undergo a costly and invasive colonoscopy to exclude organic disease. Clinician's and researchers have identified a need for a new cost-effective, accurate, and noninvasive diagnostic test for IBS.

methodsUsing a diagnostic case-control study, we explored the use of bowel sounds to characterize IBS with a view to diagnostic use. We recruited participants with an existing clinical diagnosis of IBS or healthy (asymptomatic) digestive systems. We recorded bowel sounds for 2 hours after fasting and then for 40 minutes after a standard meal.

resultsWe here report our results including our accuracy in characterizing IBS-related bowel sounds and differentiation between participants with IBS and healthy participants. Leave-one-out cross-validation of our model developed using the first 31 IBS and 37 healthy participants gave 90% sensitivity and 92% specificity for IBS diagnosis. Independent testing using the next 15 IBS and 15 healthy participants demonstrated 87% sensitivity and 87% specificity for IBS diagnosis.

conclusionsThese preliminary results provide proof of concept for the use of bowel sound analysis to identify IBS. A prospective study is needed to confirm these findings. TRANSLATIONAL IMPACT: Our belt and model offer hope of a new approach for IBS diagnosis in primary practice. Combined with screening tests for organic disease, it would offer greater confidence to patients and could reduce the burden of unnecessary colonoscopies for health care systems and patients.

Indexed as

Biosensing TechniquesAdultCase-Control StudiesDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFemaleHumansIrritable Bowel SyndromeLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificitySound

Identifiers

PMID30908308
PMCPMC6602778
OpenAlexW2925001063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.