Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30908159›Full record

ArticleStroke2019

Decision Analysis Model for Prehospital Triage of Patients With Acute Stroke.

Yaqian Xu, Neal S Parikh, Boshen Jiao, Joshua Z Willey, Amelia K Boehme, Mitchell S V Elkind

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stroke, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Organizing Healthcare for Optimal Acute Ischemic Stroke Treatment.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Utility-Based Multicriteria Model for Screening Patients under the COVID-19 Pandemic.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yaqian XuFrom the Department of Health Policy and Management (Y.X., B.J.), Columbia University, New York, NY.
Neal S ParikhMailman School of Public Health and Department of Neurology, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons (N.S.P., J.Z.W., A.K.B., M.S.V.E.), Columbia University, New York, NY.
Boshen JiaoFrom the Department of Health Policy and Management (Y.X., B.J.), Columbia University, New York, NY.
Joshua Z WilleyMailman School of Public Health and Department of Neurology, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons (N.S.P., J.Z.W., A.K.B., M.S.V.E.), Columbia University, New York, NY.
Amelia K BoehmeDepartment of Epidemiology (A.K.B., M.S.V.E.), Columbia University, New York, NY.
Mitchell S V ElkindDepartment of Epidemiology (A.K.B., M.S.V.E.), Columbia University, New York, NY.
Columbia University · US

Funding

NEUROEPIDEMIOLOGY TRAINING PROGRAMT32NS007153 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI GU, YIAN, WILLEY, JOSHUA ZEBADIAH · 1987 to 2023
$6.2M
NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS007153
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Purpose- We used a decision analysis approach to analyze triage strategies for patients with acute stroke symptoms while accounting for prehospital large vessel occlusion (LVO) screening methods and key time metrics. Methods- Our decision analysis compared anticipated functional outcomes for patients within the IV-tPA (intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator) treatment window in the mothership and drip-and-ship frameworks. Key branches of the model included IV-tPA eligibility, presence of an LVO, and endovascular therapy eligibility. Our decision analysis evaluated 2 prehospital LVO screening approaches: (1) no formal screening and (2) the use of clinical LVO screening scales. An excellent outcome was defined as modified Rankin Scale scores 0-1. Probabilities and workflow times were guideline-based or imputed from published studies. In sensitivity analyses, we individually and jointly varied transport time to the nearest primary stroke center, additional time required to transport directly to a comprehensive stroke center, and LVO screening scale predictive probabilities. We evaluated 2 separate scenarios: one in which ideal time metrics were achieved and one under current real-world metrics. Results- In the ideal metrics scenario, the drip-and-ship strategy was almost always favored in the absence of formal LVO screening. For patients screened positive for an LVO, mothership was favored if the additional transport time to the comprehensive stroke center was <3 to 23 minutes. Under real-world conditions, in which primary stroke center workflow is slower than ideal, the mothership strategy was favored in more scenarios, regardless of formal LVO screening. For example, mothership was favored with an additional transport time to the comprehensive stroke center of <32 to 99 minutes for patients screened positive for an LVO and <28 to 39 minutes in the absence of screening. Conclusions- Joint consideration of LVO probability, screening, workflow times, and transport times may improve prehospital stroke triage. Drip-and-ship was more favorable when more ideal primary stroke center workflow times were modeled.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesTriageBrain IschemiaEmergency Medical ServicesEndovascular ProceduresFibrinolytic AgentsHumansModels, TheoreticalStrokeThrombolytic TherapyTime-to-TreatmentTissue Plasminogen ActivatorFibrinolytic AgentsTissue Plasminogen Activatorcerebrovascular diseaseemergency medical serviceshealth servicesprobabilitytriageworkflow

Identifiers

PMID30908159
PMCPMC6435279
OpenAlexW2921033526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.