Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30907863›Full record

ArticleOptometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry2019

Visuo-oculomotor Function and Reaction Times in Athletes with and without Concussion.

Graham D Cochrane, Jennifer B Christy, Anwar Almutairi, Claudio Busettini, Mark W Swanson, Katherine K Weise

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Graham D Cochrane
Jennifer B ChristyDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Anwar AlmutairiDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Claudio BusettiniDepartment of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Mark W SwansonDepartment of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Katherine K WeiseDepartment of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Visual Phenotyping CoreP30EY003039 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Oliver W Gramlich · 1985 to 2026
$16.9M
MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM008361 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI YACOUBIAN, TALENE ALENE · 1992 to 2024
$16.8M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY003039NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008361
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

significanceOculomotor tests in concussion commonly show impairment in smooth pursuit and saccadic function. Honing in on the systems likely to be affected by concussion will streamline use of oculomotor function as a supplemental diagnostic and prognostic tool, as well as improve our understanding of the pathophysiology of concussion. PURPOSE: This study investigates oculomotor function between concussed and healthy collegiate athletes and determines measurement test-retest reliability of those tools.

methodsEighty-seven healthy athletes were recruited from a U.S. Division 1 sports university and completed a 30-minute vestibular ocular testing battery in an enclosed rotary chair system equipped with 100-Hz eye-tracking goggles. Forty-three individuals completed the battery twice. Twenty-eight individuals with a current diagnosis of concussion also completed the battery. All participants were aged 18 to 24 years. Bivariate statistical tests examined differences in scores across groups, and intraclass coefficients were computed to test reliability.

resultsConcussed individuals had significantly longer saccadic, visual, and dual-task reaction times and reduced saccadic accuracy. There was no difference in optokinetic reflex gain, but few concussed individuals tolerated the task. Reaction time latencies and optokinetic gain show moderate test-retest reliability. Smooth pursuit tasks and saccadic accuracies showed poor test-retest reliability.

conclusionsSaccadic latency was the most sensitive oculomotor function to change after concussion and was reliable over time. Saccadic accuracy was significantly lower in the concussed group but had poor retest reliability. Optokinetic gain may warrant more investigation because of its high test-retest reliability and symptom provocation in concussion, despite not showing a significant difference between groups.

Indexed as

AdolescentAthletesAthletic InjuriesBrain ConcussionFemaleHumansMaleNeuropsychological TestsPsychomotor PerformancePursuit, SmoothReaction TimeReproducibility of ResultsSaccadesVestibular Function TestsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30907863
PMCPMC6445703
OpenAlexW2923130026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.