Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30907746›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2019

Patient Rounds With Video-Consulted Relatives: Qualitative Study on Possibilities and Barriers From the Perspective of Healthcare Providers.

Christina Østervang, Lene Vedel Vestergaard, Karin Brochstedt Dieperink, Dorthe Boe Danbjørg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The cost of living with cancer during the second wave of COVID-19: A mixed methods study of Danish cancer patients' perspectives.European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christina Østervang *Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-5990-0167
Lene Vedel Vestergaard *Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-0832-2330
Karin Brochstedt Dieperink *Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4766-3242
Dorthe Boe Danbjørg *Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9188-403X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn cancer settings, relatives are often seen as a resource as they are able to support the patient and remember information during hospitalization. However, geographic distance to hospitals, work, and family obligations are reasons that may cause difficulties for relatives' physical participation during hospitalization. This provided inspiration to uncover the possibility of telehealth care in connection with enabling participation by relatives during patient rounds. Telehealth is used advantageously in health care systems but is also at risk of failing during the implementation process because of, for instance, health care professionals' resistance to change. Research on the implications for health care professionals in involving relatives' participation through virtual presence during patient rounds is limited.

objectiveThis study aimed to investigate health care professionals' experiences in using and implementing technology to involve relatives during video-consulted patient rounds.

methodsThe design was a qualitative approach. Methods used were focus group interviews, short open interviews, and field observations of health care professionals working at a cancer department. The text material was analyzed using interpretative phenomenological analysis.

resultsField observational studies were conducted for 15 days, yielding 75 hours of observation. A total of 14 sessions of video-consulted patient rounds were observed and 15 pages of field notes written, along with 8 short open interviews with physicians, nurses, and staff from management. Moreover, 2 focus group interviews with 9 health care professionals were conducted. Health care professionals experienced the use of technology as a way to facilitate involvement of the patient's relatives, without them being physically present. Moreover, it raised questions about whether this way of conducting patient rounds could address the needs of both the patients and the relatives. Time, culture, and change of work routines were found to be the major barriers when implementing new technology involving relatives.

conclusionsThis study identified a double change by introducing both new technology and virtual participation by relatives at the same time. The change had consequences on health care professionals' work routines with regard to work load, culture, and organization because of the complexity in health care systems.

Indexed as

FamilyHealth PersonnelHumansQualitative ResearchReferral and ConsultationTelemedicineVideo Recordingcancerfamilyqualitative researchrelativestechnologytelehealth

Identifiers

PMID30907746
PMCPMC6452284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.