Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30907733›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2019

Patient Engagement as Measured by Inpatient Portal Use: Methodology for Log File Analysis.

Timothy Huerta, Naleef Fareed, Jennifer L Hefner, Cynthia J Sieck, Christine Swoboda, Robert Taylor, Ann Scheck McAlearney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Improving Acceptance of Inpatient Portals: Patients' and Care Team Members' Perspectives.Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Timothy Huerta *Department of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9978-3564
Naleef Fareed *Department of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8764-1625
Jennifer L HefnerDepartment of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8083-8038
Cynthia J SieckDepartment of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6517-885X
Christine SwobodaCATALYST: Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking in Health Services and Implementation Science Research, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2085-2126
Robert TaylorCATALYST: Center for the Advancement of Team Science, Analytics, and Systems Thinking in Health Services and Implementation Science Research, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9116-8348
Ann Scheck McAlearneyDepartment of Family Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9107-5419

Funding

The Institute for the Design of Environments Aligned for Patient Safety (IDEA4PS)P30HS024379 · AHRQ · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MCALEARNEY, ANN SCHECK · 2015 to 2015
$4.0M
High Tech and High Touch (HT2): Transforming patient engagement through portal technology at the bedsideR01HS024091 · AHRQ · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MCALEARNEY, ANN SCHECK · 2015 to 2018
$967k
Portals in Inpatient Care (PIC): Evaluating the Usability, Use and Patient Experience Associated with Patient Portal Technology at the BedsideR21HS024349 · AHRQ · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MCALEARNEY, ANN SCHECK · 2015 to 2015
$299k
AHRQ HHS P30 HS024379AHRQ HHS R01 HS024091AHRQ HHS R21 HS024349
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInpatient portals (IPPs) have the potential to increase patient engagement and satisfaction with their health care. An IPP provides a hospitalized patient with similar functions to those found in outpatient portals, including the ability to view vital signs, laboratory results, and medication information; schedule appointments; and communicate with their providers. However, IPPs may offer additional functions such as meal planning, real-time messaging with the inpatient care team, daily schedules, and access to educational materials relevant to their specific condition. In practice, IPPs have been developed as websites and tablet apps, with hospitals providing the required technology as a component of care during the patient's stay.

objectiveThis study aimed to describe how inpatients are using IPPs at the first academic medical center to implement a system-wide IPP and document the challenges and choices associated with this analytic process.

methodsWe analyzed the audit log files of IPP users hospitalized between January 2014 and January 2016. Data regarding the date/time and duration of interactions with each of the MyChart Bedside modules (eg, view lab results or medications and patient schedule) and activities (eg, messaging the provider and viewing educational videos) were captured as part of the system audit logs. The development of a construct to describe the length of time associated with a single coherent use of the tool-which we call a session-provides a foundational unit of analysis. We defined frequency as the number of sessions a patient has during a given provision day. We defined comprehensiveness in terms of the percentage of functions that an individual uses during a given provision day.

resultsThe analytic process presented data challenges such as length of stay and tablet-provisioning factors. This study presents data visualizations to illustrate a series of data-cleaning issues. In the presence of these robust approaches to data cleaning, we present the baseline usage patterns associated with our patient panel. In addition to frequency and comprehensiveness, we present considerations of median data to mitigate the effect of outliers.

conclusionsAlthough other studies have published usage data associated with IPPs, most have not explicated the challenges and choices associated with the analytic approach deployed within each study. Our intent in this study was to be somewhat exhaustive in this area, in part, because replicability requires common metrics. Our hope is that future researchers in this area will avail themselves of these perspectives to engage in critical assessment moving forward.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsHumansInpatientsMedical InformaticsPatient ParticipationPatient Portalshealth information technologyhealth records, personalinpatient portalspatient portals

Identifiers

PMID30907733
PMCPMC6452277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.