Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30907686›Full record

ArticleJournal of palliative medicine2019

How Do Blood Cancer Doctors Discuss Prognosis? Findings from a National Survey of Hematologic Oncologists.

Anand R Habib, Angel M Cronin, Craig C Earle, James A Tulsky, Jennifer W Mack, Gregory A Abel, Oreofe O Odejide

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of palliative medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. More than "hematology": a qualitative study on the experience of hematologists treating people with blood cancer in Greece.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anand R Habib1 Division of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Angel M Cronin1 Division of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Craig C Earle3 Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
James A Tulsky2 Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jennifer W Mack1 Division of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Gregory A Abel1 Division of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Oreofe O Odejide1 Division of Population Sciences, Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · USHarvard University · USOntario Institute for Cancer Research · CA

Funding

Improving Hospice Use for Patients with Blood CancersK08CA218295 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI ODEJIDE, OREOFE OLUKEMI · 2017 to 2022
$985k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA218295
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

CommunicationPhysician-Patient RelationsPrognosisAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHematologic NeoplasmsHospice CareHumansMaleMiddle AgedOncologistsSurveys and QuestionnairesTerminal Carecommunicationhematologic neoplasmsprognosisterminal care

Identifiers

PMID30907686
PMCPMC6533786
OpenAlexW2938523005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.