Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30907564›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie2019

Predictors of dysplastic and neoplastic progression of Barrett’s esophagus

Saleh Alnasser, Raman Agnihotram, Myriam Martel, Serge Mayrand, Eduardo Franco, Lorenzo Ferri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Magnitude and Time-Trend Analysis of Postendoscopy Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. The Impact of Hiatus Hernia Size on Dysplasia Progression in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Saleh AlnasserFrom the Department of General Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Que. (Alnasser); the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics – Cancer Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, Que. (Agnihotram, Franco); and the Ringgold Standard Institution – Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Que. (Martel, Mayrand, Ferri).
Raman AgnihotramFrom the Department of General Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Que. (Alnasser); the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics – Cancer Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, Que. (Agnihotram, Franco); and the Ringgold Standard Institution – Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Que. (Martel, Mayrand, Ferri).
Myriam MartelFrom the Department of General Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Que. (Alnasser); the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics – Cancer Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, Que. (Agnihotram, Franco); and the Ringgold Standard Institution – Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Que. (Martel, Mayrand, Ferri).
Serge MayrandFrom the Department of General Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Que. (Alnasser); the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics – Cancer Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, Que. (Agnihotram, Franco); and the Ringgold Standard Institution – Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Que. (Martel, Mayrand, Ferri).
Eduardo FrancoFrom the Department of General Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Que. (Alnasser); the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics – Cancer Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, Que. (Agnihotram, Franco); and the Ringgold Standard Institution – Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Que. (Martel, Mayrand, Ferri).
Lorenzo FerriFrom the Department of General Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Que. (Alnasser); the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics – Cancer Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, Que. (Agnihotram, Franco); and the Ringgold Standard Institution – Gastroenterology, McGill University Health Centre, Montréal, Que. (Martel, Mayrand, Ferri).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: It is unknown why some cases of Barrett’s esophagus progress to invasive malignant disease rapidly while others do so more slowly or not at all. The aim of this study was to identify demographic and endoscopic factors that predict dysplastic and neoplastic progression in patients with Barrett’s esophagus. Methods: Patients with Barrett’s esophagus who were assessed in 2000–2010 were assessed for inclusion in this retrospective study. Demographic and endoscopic variables were collected from an endoscopy database and the medical chart. Dysplastic and neoplastic progression was examined by time-to-event analysis. We used Cox proportional hazard regression modelling and generalized estimating equation methods to identify variables that were most predictive of neoplastic progression. Results: A total of 518 patients had Barrett’s esophagus confirmed by endoscopy and pathology and at least 2 surveillance visits. Longer Barrett’s esophagus segment (≥ 3 cm) (odds ratio [OR] 1.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1–1.3) and increased age (≥ 60 yr) (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.7–7.4) were independent predictors of progression from nondysplasia to dysplastic or neoplastic grades. Presence of mucosal irregularities (OR 8.6, 95% CI 2.4–30.4) and increased age (OR 5.1, 95% CI 1.6–16.6) were independent predictors of progression from nondysplasia to high-grade dysplasia or adenocarcinoma. Conclusion: Increased age, longer Barrett’s segment and presence of mucosal irregularities were associated with increased risk of dysplastic and neoplastic progression. In addition to dysplasia, these factors may help stratify patients according to risk of neoplastic progression and be used to individualize surveillance. More prospective studies with larger samples are required to validate these results.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAge FactorsBarrett EsophagusDisease ProgressionEsophageal MucosaEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagoscopyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisQuebecRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID30907564
PMCPMC6440887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.