Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30907514›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2019

Re-reading of OraQuick HIV-1/2 rapid antibody test results: quality assurance implications for HIV self-testing programmes.

Victoria Watson, Russell J Dacombe, Christopher Williams, Thomas Edwards, Emily R Adams, Cheryl C Johnson, Miriam N Mutseta, Elizabeth L Corbett, Frances M Cowan, Helen Ayles and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Victoria WatsonDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Russell J DacombeDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Christopher WilliamsResearch Centre for Drugs and Diagnostics, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Thomas EdwardsResearch Centre for Drugs and Diagnostics, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Emily R AdamsResearch Centre for Drugs and Diagnostics, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Cheryl C JohnsonHIV Department, World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland.
Miriam N MutsetaPopulation Services International, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Elizabeth L CorbettDepartment of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Frances M CowanDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Helen AylesDepartment of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Karin HatzoldPopulation Services International, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Peter MacPhersonMalawi Liverpool Welcome Trust, Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.
Miriam TaegtmeyerDepartment of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 200901/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust 206575/Z/17/ZWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionScale-up of HIV self-testing (HIVST) will play a key role in meeting the United Nation's 90-90-90 targets. Delayed re-reading of used HIVST devices has been used by early implementation studies to validate the performance of self-test kits and to estimate HIV positivity among self-testers. We investigated the stability of results on used devices under controlled conditions to assess its potential as a quality assurance approach for HIVST scale-up.

methods444 OraQuick RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: There was a high incidence of device instability. Forty-three (29%) of 148 initially non-reactive results became false weak-reactive results. These changes were observed across all incubation conditions, the earliest on Day 4 (n = 9 kits). No initially HIV-reactive results changed to a non-reactive result. There were no significant associations between storage conditions and hazard of results transition. We observed substantial statistical agreement between independent re-readers over time (agreement range: 0.74 to 0.96).

conclusionsDelayed re-reading of used OraQuick

Indexed as

AdultHIV-1HIV AntibodiesHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMass ScreeningReagent Kits, DiagnosticSerologic TestsHIV AntibodiesReagent Kits, DiagnosticDelayed re-readingFalse reactiveHIV self-testingHIV testingMisdiagnosisQuality assuranceVisual stability

Identifiers

PMID30907514
PMCPMC6432491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.