Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30907513›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2019

Regulation of HIV self-testing in Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe: a qualitative study with key stakeholders.

Russell J Dacombe, Victoria Watson, Lot Nyirenda, Claudius Madanhire, Musonda Simwinga, Lignet Chepuka, Cheryl C Johnson, Elizabeth L Corbett, Karin Hatzold, Miriam Taegtmeyer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Russell J DacombeCommunity Health Systems Group, Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Victoria WatsonCommunity Health Systems Group, Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Lot NyirendaCommunity Health Systems Group, Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Claudius MadanhireCentre for Sexual Health HIV and AIDS Research, Harare, Zimbabwe.
Musonda SimwingaZambart, Lusaka, Zambia.
Lignet ChepukaMedical and Surgical Nursing Department, Kamuzu College of Nursing, Blantyre, Malawi.
Cheryl C JohnsonHIV Department, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Elizabeth L CorbettClinical Research Programme, Malawi Liverpool Welcome Trust, Blantyre, Malawi.
Karin HatzoldPopulation Services International, Harae, Zimbabwe.
Miriam TaegtmeyerCommunity Health Systems Group, Department of International Public Health, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBCentre for Sexual Health and HIV AIDS Research · ZWKamuzu Central Hospital · MWNational Blood Service Zimbabwe · ZWUniversity of Liverpool · GBWorld Health Organization · CHZambart · ZM

Funding

UnitaidWellcome Trust 200901/Z/16/ZWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHIV self-testing (HIVST) is being introduced as a new way for more undiagnosed people to know their HIV status. As countries start to implement HIVST, assuring the quality and regulating in vitro diagnostics, including HIVST, are essential. We aimed to document the emerging regulatory landscape and perceptions of key stakeholders involved in HIVST policy and regulation prior to implementation in three low- and middle-income countries.

methodsBetween April and August 2016, we conducted semi-structured interviews in Malawi, Zambia and Zimbabwe to understand the relationships between different stakeholders on their perceptions of current and future HIVST regulation and the potential impact on implementation. We purposively sampled and interviewed 66 national-level key stakeholders from the Ministry of Health and the regulatory, laboratory, logistical, donor and non-governmental sectors. We used a thematic approach to analysis with an inductively developed common coding framework to allow inter-country comparison of emerging themes.

resultsIn all countries, the national reference laboratory was monitoring the quality of HIVST kits entering the public sector. In Malawi, there was no legal mandate to regulate medical devices, in Zambia one regulatory body with a clear mandate had started developing regulations and in Zimbabwe the mandate to regulate was overlapping between two bodies. Stakeholders indicated that they had a poor understanding of the process and requirements for HIVST regulation, as well as lack of clarity and coordination between organizational roles. The need for good collaboration between sectors, a strong post-market surveillance model for HIVST and technical assistance to develop regulators capacity was noted as priorities. Key informants identified technical working groups as a potential way collaboration could be improved upon to accelerate the regulation of HIVST.

conclusionRegulation of in vitro diagnostic devices, including HIVST, is now being recognized as important by regulators after a regional focus on pharmaceuticals. HIVST is providing an opportunity for each country to develop similar regulations to others in the region leading to a more coherent regulatory environment for the introduction of new devices.

Indexed as

Reagent Kits, DiagnosticSerologic TestsHIV AntibodiesHIV InfectionsHIV SeropositivityHumansMalawiMass ScreeningQualitative ResearchStakeholder ParticipationZambiaZimbabweHIV AntibodiesReagent Kits, Diagnosticharmonizationimplementationin vitro diagnosticspolicypost marketquality assurance

Identifiers

PMID30907513
PMCPMC6432109
OpenAlexW2924343790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.