Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30907231›Full record

ReviewPlant signaling & behavior2019

Plant immune responses - from guard cells and local responses to systemic defense against bacterial pathogens.

Lisa David, Alice C Harmon, Sixue Chen

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plant signaling & behavior, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Role ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Blocked at the Stomatal Gate, a Key Step of WheatFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  19. Frontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lisa Davida Department of Biology , University of Florida , Gainesville , FL , USA.
Alice C Harmona Department of Biology , University of Florida , Gainesville , FL , USA.
Sixue Chena Department of Biology , University of Florida , Gainesville , FL , USA.
University of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When plants are infected by pathogens two distinct responses can occur, the early being a local response in the infected area, and later a systemic response in non-infected tissues. Closure of stomata has recently been found to be a local response to bacterial pathogens. Stomata closure is linked to both salicylic acid (SA), an essential hormone in local responses and systemic acquired resistance (SAR), and absisic acid (ABA) a key regulator of drought and other abiotic stresses. SAR reduces the effects of later infections. In this review we discuss recent research elucidating the role of guard cells in local and systemic immune responses, guard cell interactions with abiotic and hormone signals, as well as putative functions and interactions between long-distance SAR signals.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, PlantImmunity, InnatePlant DiseasesPlant ImmunityPlant StomataSalicylic AcidSignal TransductionSalicylic Acidguard cellslocal immune responsesmobile signalsPlant immunitysystemic defense

Identifiers

PMID30907231
PMCPMC6512940
OpenAlexW2926894782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.