Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30906982›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology and bioengineering2019

Direct capture and conversion of CO

Maryam Ataeian, Yihua Liu, Karen Andrea Canon-Rubio, Michael Nightingale, Marc Strous, Agasteswar Vadlamani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Metagenome-assembled genome of the alkaliphilicMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  2. COApplied microbiology and biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. FeNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Differential response of photosynthetic apparatus towards alkaline pH treatment in NIES-39 and PCC 7345 strains of Arthrospira platensis.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2021
    Article
  15. Direct capture and conversion of COBiotechnology and bioengineering · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Maryam AtaeianDepartment of Geoscience, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Yihua LiuDepartment of Geoscience, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Karen Andrea Canon-RubioDepartment of Geoscience, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Michael NightingaleDepartment of Geoscience, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Marc StrousDepartment of Geoscience, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Agasteswar VadlamaniDepartment of Geoscience, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8579-4545

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) is recognized as a potential negative emission technology, needed to keep global warming within safe limits. With current technologies, large-scale implementation of BECCS would compromise food production. Bioenergy derived from phototrophic microorganisms, with direct capture of CO

Indexed as

AirBioreactorsMicrobial ConsortiaCarbon DioxideCyanobacteriaHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationCarbon DioxidealkalinityBECCSCyanobacteria consortiumdirect carbon capturephotosynthesissoda Lakes

Identifiers

PMID30906982
PMCPMC6593468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.