ReviewParasite epidemiology and control2019
Seroprevalence of
Review in Parasite epidemiology and control, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.
- Disentangling the role of wild birds in avian metapneumovirus (aMPV) epidemiology: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2022Pooled it
- Seroprevalence ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
- High seroprevalence and associated risk factors ofVeterinary world · 2025Article
- Article
- Serologic and molecular survey ofOpen veterinary journal · 2025Review
- Occurrence ofVeterinary world · 2024Article
- Review
- Article
- Seroprevalence ofInternational journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2024Article
- Revealing the Prevalence ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Seroepidemiological and biomolecular survey onFood and waterborne parasitology · 2024Article
- Sero-epidemiological investigation on Toxoplasma gondii infection in Apennine wolf (Canis lupus italicus) and wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Italy.BMC veterinary research · 2024Article
- Global Proteome-Wide Analysis of Cysteine S-Nitrosylation inMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Article
- Seroprevalence and Risk Factors forVeterinary sciences · 2023Article
- Systematic Review and Modelling of Age-Dependent Prevalence ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Molecular occurrence and risk factors for Toxoplasma gondii infection in equids in Jilin, China.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Contamination of Soil, Water, Fresh Produce, and Bivalve Mollusks withMicroorganisms · 2022Review
- A serological survey of Toxoplasma gondii in polish pigs from organic farms, other housing systems and in pigs of different age groups.Acta veterinaria Scandinavica · 2022Article
- Geospatial epidemiology of Toxoplasma gondii infection in livestock, pets, and humans in China, 1984-2020.Parasitology research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background
methodsWe conducted a systematic review of seroprevalence studies and meta-analysis to estimate the seroprevalence of
findingsFrom a total of 271 studies identified in the systematic review, 32 were included in the meta-analysis. These comprised of 13 studies on domestic pigs, six on sheep, three on cattle, six on wild boars, and four on moose. The estimated pooled seroprevalence of
conclusionsA substantial proportion of animals raised or hunted for human consumption in the region had tested positive for
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.