Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30906824›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in behavioral sciences2019

Network Neuroscience of Creative Cognition: Mapping Cognitive Mechanisms and Individual Differences in the Creative Brain.

Roger E Beaty, Paul Seli, Daniel L Schacter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in behavioral sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Creative thinking in Parkinson's disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Lower engagement of cognitive control in children on ChatGPT.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Creativity: a (white) matter of connectivity.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Roger E BeatyDepartment of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University.
Paul SeliDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University.
Daniel L SchacterDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University.

Funding

EVENT RELATED NEUROIMAGING OF HUMAN MEMORY FORMATIONR01MH060941 · NIMH · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI SCHACTER, DANIEL L · 2000 to 2025
$9.5M
AGING MEMORYR37AG008441 · NIA · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI SCHACTER, DANIEL L · 2000 to 2009
$3.3M
Episodic Retrieval and Problem Solving in AgingR01AG008441 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI SCHACTER, DANIEL L · 1989 to 2022
$3.1M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG008441NIA NIH HHS R37 AG008441NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH060941
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Network neuroscience research is providing increasing specificity on the contribution of large-scale brain networks to creative cognition. Here, we summarize recent experimental work examining cognitive mechanisms of network interactions and correlational studies assessing network dynamics associated with individual creative abilities. Our review identifies three cognitive processes related to network interactions during creative performance:

Indexed as

creativitydefault networkdivergent thinkingexecutive control networkfunctional connectivitynetwork neuroscience

Identifiers

PMID30906824
PMCPMC6428436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.