Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30906823›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in behavioral sciences2018

Impact of sex on pain and opioid analgesia: a review.

Evan F Fullerton, Hillary H Doyle, Anne Z Murphy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in behavioral sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Evan F FullertonNeuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta GA, 30303.
Hillary H DoyleNeuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta GA, 30303.
Anne Z MurphyNeuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta GA, 30303.
Georgia State University · US

Funding

Impact of advanced age on opiate analgesiaR01DA041529 · NIDA · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MURPHY, ANNE Z · 2017 to 2021
$1.8M
Sex Differences in Opioid AnalgesiaR01DA016272 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI MURPHY, ANNE Z · 2002 to 2006
$1.5M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA016272NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA041529
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic pain is a debilitating condition that impacts tens of millions each year, resulting in lost wages for workers and exacting considerable costs in health care and rehabilitation. A thorough understanding of the neural mechanisms underlying pain and analgesia is critical to facilitate the development of therapeutic strategies and personalized medicine. Clinical and epidemiological studies report that women experience greater levels of pain than men and have higher rates of pain-related disorders. Studies in both rodents and humans report sex differences in the anatomical and physiologic properties of the descending antinociceptive circuit, mu opioid receptor (MOR) expression and binding, morphine metabolism, and immune system activation, all of which likely contribute to the observed sex differences in pain and opioid analgesia. Although more research is needed to elucidate the underlying mechanisms, these sex differences present potential therapeutic targets to optimize pain management strategies for both sexes.

Identifiers

PMID30906823
PMCPMC6428208
OpenAlexW2891257271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.