Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30906637›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2019

Clinical benefits of Livin peptide-loaded DCs/CIKs combined with chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Luping Zhang, Zihan Xu, Xiewan Chen, Yuzhong Duan, Zhengtang Chen, Jianguo Sun

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of cancer research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Adoptive cell therapies in thoracic malignancies.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Advances of Exosomes Extraction and Its Mechanism in Early Diagnosis of Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Livin Regulates H2A.XFrontiers in oncology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Luping ZhangCancer Institute of People's Liberation Army, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Zihan XuCancer Institute of People's Liberation Army, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Xiewan ChenDepartment of Medical English, College of Basic Medicine, Army Medical University Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Yuzhong DuanCancer Institute of People's Liberation Army, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Zhengtang ChenCancer Institute of People's Liberation Army, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Jianguo SunCancer Institute of People's Liberation Army, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University Chongqing, People's Republic of China.
Xinqiao Hospital · CNArmy Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies showed that Livin, a member of inhibitors of apoptosis protein (IAP), played an important role in drug and radiation resistance. When the expression of Livin was blocked, the sensitivity to both chemotherapy and radiotherapy was improved in lung cancer cells. A total of 79 patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were enrolled into the current study from Jan 2012 to Apr 2016. The Livin and MUC-1 groups received one-cycle autologous DCs/CIKs infusion on days 11 to 14 additionally. The clinical efficacy, immune index, KPS score and adverse events were compared among the three groups. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) in Livin and MUC-1 groups was significantly longer than that in Chemo group (195 and 211 vs 138 days, P < 0.05), and the objective response rate (ORR) in Livin and MUC-1 groups was significantly higher than that in Chemo group (23.1% and 22.2% vs 5.1%, P < 0.05). The Tetramer value after treatment in Livin group was significantly higher than that before treatment (4.07 ± 3.77 vs 3.16 ± 3.82, P < 0.05). The concentration of Livin antibody in patients' peripheral blood before and after treatment in Livin group had no significant difference (P > 0.05). As for KPS score, scarce decrease was found in Livin and MUC-1 groups after chemotherapy treatment (0.77 ± 6.41 and 0.37 ± 5.18, respectively). However, obvious decrease of KPS score (P < 0.039) was recorded in Chemo group (3.85 ± 6.33). There was no significant difference in disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), T cell subsets, cytokine levels (IFN-γ and IL-2) and adverse events between the three groups (P > 0.05). Livin peptide could be a novel substitute to trigger cell immunity by loading DCs in combination with chemotherapy in NSCLC.

Indexed as

cytokine-induced killer cellscytotherapyDendritic cellsLivin peptidenon-small-cell lung cancer

Identifiers

PMID30906637
PMCPMC6405969
OpenAlexW2990290982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.