ArticleBio-design and manufacturing2018
A Perspective on 3D Bioprinting in Tissue Regeneration.
Article in Bio-design and manufacturing, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Overview of 3D Bioprinting Impact on Cell Viability: From Damage Assessment to Protection Solutions.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2025Review
- 3D bioprinting of liver models: A systematic scoping review of methods, bioinks, and reporting quality.Materials today. Bio · 2024Article
- Review
- Contribution of the ELRs to the development of advancedFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- An Adhesive Bioink toward Biofabrication under Wet Conditions.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2023Article
- Minimally invasive bioprinting forBioactive materials · 2023Article
- ZIM1 Combined with Hydrogel Inhibits Senescence of Primary PαS Cells during In Vitro Expansion.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- 142Development of an alginate-gelatin bioink enhancing osteogenic differentiation by gelatin release.International journal of bioprinting · 2023Article
- A review on cell damage, viability, and functionality during 3D bioprinting.Military Medical Research · 2022Review
- 3D skin bioprinting: future potential for skin regeneration.Postepy dermatologii i alergologii · 2022Review
- Portable hand-held bioprinters promote in situ tissue regeneration.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2022Review
- Three-Dimensional Bioprinting of Decellularized Extracellular Matrix-Based Bioinks for Tissue Engineering.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Multifunctional GelMA platforms with nanomaterials for advanced tissue therapeutics.Bioactive materials · 2022Review
- Review on Multicomponent Hydrogel Bioinks Based on Natural Biomaterials for Bioprinting 3D Liver Tissues.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Constructing biomimetic liver models through biomaterials and vasculature engineering.Regenerative biomaterials · 2022Review
- A Smartphone-Enabled Portable Digital Light Processing 3D Printer.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2021Article
- Bioscaffolds embedded with regulatory modules for cell growth and tissue formation: A review.Bioactive materials · 2021Review
- Lightweight 3D bioprinting with point by point photocuring.Bioactive materials · 2021Article
- Physicochemical parameters that underlie inkjet printing for medical applications.Biophysics reviews · 2020Review
- Modeling the Three-Dimensional Bioprinting Process of β-Sheet Self-Assembling Peptide Hydrogel Scaffolds.Frontiers in medical technology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.