Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30906569›Full record

ReviewFuture science OA2019

Mass spectrometry-based intraoperative tumor diagnostics.

Lorena Hänel, Marcel Kwiatkowski, Laura Heikaus, Hartmut Schlüter

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Future science OA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. International journal of biomedical imaging · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Domain adaptation and self-supervised learning for surgical margin detection.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lorena HänelInstitute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Marcel KwiatkowskiInstitute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Laura HeikausInstitute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Hartmut SchlüterInstitute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In surgical oncology, decisions regarding the amount of tissue to be removed can have important consequences: the decision between preserving sufficient healthy tissue and eliminating all tumor cells is one to be made intraoperatively. This review discusses the latest technical innovations for a more accurate tumor margin localization based on mass spectrometry. Highlighting the latest mass spectrometric inventions, real-time diagnosis seems to be within reach; focusing on the intelligent knife, desorption electrospray ionization, picosecond infrared laser and MasSpec pen, the current technical status is evaluated critically concerning its scientific and medical practice.

Indexed as

cancerDESIiKnifeintraoperative tumor diagnosticsMasSpec penPIRLreal-time diagnosissurgerytumor margin

Identifiers

PMID30906569
PMCPMC6426168

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.