ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2019
Effects of SI and PCV on respiratory mechanics, early central drive and hemodynamics in patients with ARDS.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Effects of sustained inflation (SI) and pressure- controlled ventilation (PCV) on respiratory mechanics, early central drive, and hemodynamics in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) were investigated and compared. A retrospective analysis of 26 patients with ARDS, who were admitted to the Yiwu Central Hospital from March 2015 to March 2016, was performed. According to the ventilation method adopted by the patients with ARDS, 13 patients who received SI treatment were included in the SI group and 13 patients who received PCV treatment were included in the PCV group. The condition of central drive of the patients in the two groups was recorded and calculated continuously before and after recruitment maneuver (RM), the changes of each indicator of the respiratory function and hemodynamics were recorded and calculated before and after RM at 1, 10, 20 and 30 min. The differences were not statistically significant when comparing PIP, Pplate and Crs in patients in the SI group and the PCV group before RM with those after RM at 1, 10, 20 and 30 min (P>0.05), the differences were not statistically significant when comparing heart rate and mean arterial pressure in patients in the SI group and the PCV group before RM with those after RM at 1, 10, 20 and 30 min (P>0.05). Ηowever, central venous pressure in patients in the SI group after RM at 10 and 20 min was significantly higher than that in the PCV group, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). VT/RMS, VE/RMS and ΔPdi/RMS in the SI group and the PCV group after RM were significantly higher than those before RM, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). There was little difference in the effect between SI and PCV on respiratory mechanics, early central drive and hemodynamics in patients with ARDS, and both mechanical ventilation methods enhanced the effect of central-mechanical-ventilation coupling after RM. Therefore, the two mechanical ventilation methods, SI and PCV, were equally available for patients with ARDS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.