Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30905612›Full record

ArticleNeuropharmacology2019

Cocaine-associated decision-making: Toward isolating preference.

Joshua S Beckmann, Jonathan J Chow, Blake A Hutsell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Intermittent and extended cocaine access attenuate cocaine-vs-food choice in male and female rats.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Learning from lorcaserin: lessons from the negative clinical trial of lorcaserin to treat cocaine use disorder.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joshua S BeckmannDepartment of Psychology, University of Kentucky, 741 S. Limestone, Lexington, KY, 40536, USA. Electronic address: joshua.beckmann@uky.edu.
Jonathan J ChowDepartment of Psychology, University of Kentucky, 741 S. Limestone, Lexington, KY, 40536, USA. Electronic address: jonathan.chow@uky.edu.
Blake A HutsellDepartment of Psychology, Eastern Carolina University, Rawl 222, Mail Stop 565, Greenville, NC, 27858, USA. Electronic address: hutsellb16@ecu.edu.

Funding

Training in Drug Abuse Related Research.T32DA016176 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI DWOSKIN, LINDA P · 2004 to 2020
$4.0M
A translational determination of the mechanisms of maladaptive choice in cocaine use disorderR01DA045023 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI BECKMANN, JOSHUA, LILE, JOSHUA ANTHONY · 2018 to 2022
$3.0M
Medications Development for Cocaine: A Translational Approach in Monkey and HumanR01DA033364 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI LILE, JOSHUA ANTHONY · 2013 to 2016
$1.9M
Tonic and Phasic Glutamate Release in Incentive Salience and Cocaine ReinforcemenR00DA033373 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI BECKMANN, JOSHUA · 2014 to 2016
$741k
Tonic and Phasic Glutamate Release in Incentive Salience and Cocaine ReinforcemenK99DA033373 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI BECKMANN, JOSHUA · 2012 to 2013
$263k
NIDA NIH HHS K99 DA033373NIDA NIH HHS R00 DA033373NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA045023NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA016176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ever-increasing evidence suggests that substance use disorder is mediated by decision-making processes, and as such, providing nondrug alternatives can shift maladaptive preferences away from drug reinforcers, such as cocaine. Of note, a recent hypothesis suggests that preference for cocaine is simply a byproduct of cocaine intake, such that the 'direct' effects of cocaine weaken the impact of non-drug alternatives while measuring choice. Conversely, existing quantitative theories of decision-making suggest preference is determined by various dimensions of concurrent reinforcers that in turn determine the relative value of available alternatives. Toward teasing apart the conflicting theories above, we developed a novel drug-choice procedure to control for reinforcer frequency and magnitude (two reinforcer dimensions well known to influence preference) that consequently controls for overall cocaine intake. As predicted by quantitative choice theory, results suggest that cocaine intake and preference are dissociable while measuring choice, with reinforcer frequency and magnitude having independent influence on the relative value of choice alternatives. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the choice procedure is sensitive to various manipulations known to alter cocaine reinforcement, all while keeping cocaine intake constant. Finally, the results point to the process of economic substitution as an important avenue of future neurobehavioral investigation toward the improvement of behavioral and pharmacological therapies for substance use disorders. Overall, the proposed choice procedure will allow for improved isolation of the neurobehavioral processes that mediate drug-associated decision-making in future studies.

Indexed as

Reinforcement, PsychologyAnimalsCocaineDecision MakingDopamine Uptake InhibitorsDose-Response Relationship, DrugEatingRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySelf AdministrationCocaineDopamine Uptake InhibitorsChoiceCocaineDecision-makingEconomic substitution

Identifiers

PMID30905612
PMCPMC7716654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.