Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30905089›Full record

ArticleThe Prostate2019

Diet assessment among men undergoing genetic counseling and genetic testing for inherited prostate cancer: Exploring a teachable moment to support diet intervention.

Brandy-Joe Milliron, Michael Bruneau, Elias Obeid, Laura Gross, Lisa Bealin, Christa Smaltz, Veda N Giri

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Prostate, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Physical activity assessment among men undergoing genetic counseling for inherited prostate cancer: a teachable moment for improved survivorship.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Genetic Counseling and the Central Tenets of Practice.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Brandy-Joe MillironDepartment of Nutrition Sciences, College of Nursing and Health Professions, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Michael BruneauDepartment of Health Sciences, College of Nursing and Health Professions, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Elias ObeidDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Temple-Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Laura GrossCancer Risk Assessment and Clinical Cancer Genetics Program, Departments of Medical Oncology, Cancer Biology, and Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Lisa BealinDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Temple-Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Christa SmaltzSidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Veda N GiriCancer Risk Assessment and Clinical Cancer Genetics Program, Departments of Medical Oncology, Cancer Biology, and Urology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-7268-5913
Thomas Jefferson University · USDrexel University · USFox Chase Cancer Center · US

Funding

WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Dietmar J Kappes · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927NIH HHS Work at FCCC was supported by the CCSG (3P30CA0069)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenetic counseling (GC) and genetic testing (GT) for prostate cancer (PCA) is a rapidly growing, affording opportunity for healthy lifestyle promotion in men aligned with cancer survivorship and cancer prevention goals. We conducted a targeted dietary analysis of men undergoing GC/GT for PCA for adherence to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Food Pattern recommendations which align with preventing cancer and recurrences in the Genetic Evaluation of Men (GEM) study at two academic centers to inform future strategies for diet intervention.

methodsParticipants of GEM with PCA or at-risk for PCA completed a structured food frequency questionnaire indicating number of servings consumed per day or per week of fruits, vegetables, red meat, seafood, processed meat, and foods high in saturated fat. Adherence to the USDA recommendations was assessed for the total sample and by PCA status and aggressiveness, family history, and body mass index (BMI) through χ

resultsOf 239 males undergoing GC on the study, surveys were completed by 197 men (82.4%), and complete survey data was available on 113 men (47.3%). By the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention BMI classification, 82.3% of the cohort was overweight (45.1%) or obese (37.2%). GEM participants reported consuming less fruits (P = 0.015), less vegetables ( P < 0.001), less seafood ( P < 0.001), more processed meats ( P < 0.001), and more foods high in saturated fats ( P < 0.001) than recommended.

conclusionA high proportion of men receiving GC/GT for PCA were overweight and/or obese with lack of adherence to national diet recommendations for cancer risk and recurrence, affording a teachable moment and supporting the systematic focus of introducing nutrition intervention during GC to promote survivorship.

Indexed as

Nutrition AssessmentAgedBody Mass IndexGenetic CounselingGenetic TestingHealthy LifestyleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesityOverweightPatient ComplianceProstatic NeoplasmsRisk Assessmentdietgenetic counselinggenetic testingobesityprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID30905089
PMCPMC8283914
OpenAlexW2925239771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.