Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30904990›Full record

ReviewCurrent genetics2019

How do cells count multi-copy genes?: "Musical Chair" model for preserving the number of rDNA copies.

Tetsushi Iida, Takehiko Kobayashi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Mechanisms of ribosomopathy and phase separation-related ribosomopathy.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2025
    Review
  3. Assessing Human Ribosomal DNA Variation and Its Association With Phenotypic Outcomes.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Recent insights into the evolution of mutation rates in yeast.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Tetsushi IidaLaboratory of Genome Regeneration, Research Center for Biological Visualization, The Institute for Quantitative Biosciences (IQB), 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0032, Japan. tessiiida@iam.u-tokyo.ac.jp.
Takehiko KobayashiLaboratory of Genome Regeneration, Research Center for Biological Visualization, The Institute for Quantitative Biosciences (IQB), 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-0032, Japan. tako2015@iam.u-tokyo.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7990-3741
Quantitative BioSciences · US

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 17H01443Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 26640117Takeda Science Foundation N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To supply abundant ribosomes, multiple copies of ribosomal RNA genes (rDNA) are conserved from bacterial to human cells. In eukaryotic genomes, clusters of tandemly repeated rDNA units are present, and their number is stably maintained. Due to high level of transcription of rRNA genes, the repetitive structure is prone to rearrangement. In budding yeast, rDNA homeostasis can compensate for this by the regulation of recombination events that will change the copy number. The histone deacetylase Sir2 plays a key role in rDNA copy maintenance and its expression level determines a state of "maintenance" or "amplification" of rDNA copy number. We recently showed that Upstream Activating Factors (UAF) for RNA polymerase I act as a RNA polymerase II repressor of SIR2 transcription in response to rDNA copy loss. Furthermore, the amount of UAF, which is limited in the cell, determines the stable copy number of rDNA and is a molecular switch for rDNA recovery. In this mini-review, we propose a "Musical Chair" model for rDNA copy counting as mediated by UAF and Sir2. The model describes how a straightforward molecular mechanism can account for the "cellular memory" of the proper rDNA copy number.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsDNA, RibosomalGenes, rRNARibosomesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSilent Information Regulator Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiaeSirtuin 2Transcription FactorsDNA, RibosomalSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSilent Information Regulator Proteins, Saccharomyces cerevisiaeSIR2 protein, S cerevisiaeSirtuin 2Transcription Factorsupstream activation factor, S cerevisiaeCopy number regulation“Musical Chair” modelRibosomal RNA gene (rDNA)Sir2Upstream Activating Factors (UAF)

Identifiers

PMID30904990
OpenAlexW2942337500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.