ReviewCellular and molecular neurobiology2019
Reductive Reprogramming: A Not-So-Radical Hypothesis of Neurodegeneration Linking Redox Perturbations to Neuroinflammation and Excitotoxicity.
Review in Cellular and molecular neurobiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Protein vicinal thiols as intrinsic probes of brain redox states in health, aging, and ischemia.Metabolic brain disease · 2024Article
- Lifespan extension with preservation of hippocampal function in aged system xMolecular psychiatry · 2022Article
- Article
- Reductive stress promotes protein aggregation and impairs neurogenesis.Redox biology · 2020Article
- The Reducible Disulfide Proteome of Synaptosomes Supports a Role for Reversible Oxidations of Protein Thiols in the Maintenance of Neuronal Redox Homeostasis.Neurochemical research · 2020Article
- Bioactive Polyphenols and Neuromodulation: Molecular Mechanisms in Neurodegeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Free radical-mediated oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and excitotoxicity have long been considered insults relevant to the progression of Alzheimer's disease and other aging-related neurodegenerative disorders (NDD). Among these phenomena, the significance of oxidative stress and, more generally, redox perturbations, for NDD remain ill-defined and unsubstantiated. Here, I argue that (i) free radical-mediated oxidations of biomolecules can be dissociated from the progression of NDD, (ii) oxidative stress fails as a descriptor of cellular redox states under conditions relevant to disease, and (iii) aberrant upregulation of compensatory reducing activities in neural cells, resulting in reductive shifts in thiol-based redox potentials, may be an overlooked and paradoxical contributor to disease progression. In particular, I summarize evidence which supports the view that reductive shifts in the extracellular space can occur in response to oxidant and inflammatory signals and that these have the potential to reduce putative regulatory disulfide bonds in exofacial domains of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor, leading potentially to aberrant increases in neuronal excitability and, if sustained, excitotoxicity. The novel reductive reprogramming hypothesis of neurodegeneration presented here provides an alternative view of redox perturbations in NDD and links these to both neuroinflammation and excitotoxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.