ArticleJournal of anesthesia2019
Accuracy of the ClearSight™ system in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.
Article in Journal of anesthesia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of Continuous Non-Invasive Arterial Blood Pressure to Invasive Arterial Blood Pressure Measurement in Pregnant Women With Placenta Accreta
A Comparison of Invasive and Non-invasive Measurement of Cardiac Index and Systemic Vascular Resistance in Living Donor Liver Transplantation
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Continuous Non-Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring in Cirrhotic Patients-Friend or Foe?Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Comparison of invasive and non-invasive measurements of cardiac index and systemic vascular resistance in living-donor liver transplantation: a prospective, observational study.BMC anesthesiology · 2023Observational
- Feasibility and Accuracy of Noninvasive Continuous Arterial Pressure Monitoring during Transcatheter Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Non-invasive continuous blood pressure monitoring using the ClearSight system for pregnant women at high risks of post-partum hemorrhage: comparison with invasive blood pressure monitoring during cesarean section.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2022Article
- Noninvasive cardiac output measurements are inaccurate in patients with severe aortic valve stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2022Article
- Continuous Non-Invasive Arterial Pressure Monitoring (ClearSight System) and Ankle Blood Pressure Measurements as Alternatives to Conventional Arm Blood Pressure.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Update on the assessment of fluid responsiveness.Journal of anesthesia · 2020Article
- Anesthetic management of modified electroconvulsive therapy for a patient with coronary aneurysms: a case report.JA clinical reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe ClearSight™ device monitors continuous pressure and cardiac output via pulse contour analysis. ClearSight™, however, may not be reliable in patients with reduced peripheral perfusion caused by high peripheral resistance. This study aimed to elucidate the accuracy and trending ability of ClearSight™ in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery by comparing the ClearSight
methodsThe study included 20 patients who underwent elective AAA surgery. CI
resultsBland-Altman analysis showed a wide limit of agreement between CI
conclusionsClearSight™ was not sufficiently accurate in patients undergoing AAA surgery. The tracking ability of ClearSight™ after aortic clamping was below the acceptable limit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.