Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30904948›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2019

Evaluation of the psychological burden during the early disease trajectory in patients with intracranial tumors by the ultra-brief Patient Health Questionnaire for Depression and Anxiety (PHQ-4).

Mirjam Renovanz, Sari Soebianto, Helena Tsakmaklis, Naureen Keric, Minou Nadji-Ohl, Manfred Beutel, Florian Ringel, Daniel Wollschläger, Anne-Katrin Hickmann

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Psychometric network analysis of the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) in Paraguayan general population.Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Biological Markers in Anxiety Disorders.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Mirjam RenovanzDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center, Johannes-Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany. mirjam.renovanz@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
Sari SoebiantoDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center, Johannes-Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Helena TsakmaklisDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center, Johannes-Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Naureen KericDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center, Johannes-Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Minou Nadji-OhlDepartment of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Stuttgart, Katharinenhospital, Stuttgart, Germany.
Manfred BeutelDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center, Johannes-Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Florian RingelDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center, Johannes-Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Daniel WollschlägerInstitute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center, Johannes-Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Anne-Katrin HickmannDepartment of Neurosurgery, Klinikum Stuttgart, Katharinenhospital, Stuttgart, Germany.

Funding

Friedhelm Frees Stiftung Mainz, Germany n.a.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDepressive symptoms of patients with intracranial tumors need to be assessed adequately. The Patient Health Questionnaire for Depression and Anxiety (PHQ-4) is an ultra-short screening tool consisting of four items, a cutoff of six indicates depressive symptoms. The aim was to assess patients' psychological burden by the PHQ-4 compared with the results of well-established screening instruments.

methodsPatients were screened three times after primary diagnosis postoperatively (t1), after 3 (t2) and 6 (t3) months using the PHQ-4, the Hornheide Screening Instrument (HSI), the NCCN Distress Thermometer (DT), and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire with its brain module (EORTC QLQ-C30 + BN20). Demographic, tumor-related data, and Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) were analyzed. A cutoff value for PHQ-4 indicating a need for support or increased distress was determined by applying receiver operating characteristic (ROC).

resultsThe proportion of patients reaching a total score ≥ 6 was n = 32 out of 139 (23%) at t1; at t2, n = 12 out of 117 (10%) scored ≥ 6. At t3, n = 8 out of 96 (8%) scored ≥ 6. At t1, PHQ-4 scores did not differ significantly between gender, age groups, and tumor laterality. A cutoff value of 2.5 was identified to moderately discriminate between patients in or not in distress (sensitivity 76.8%) and between patients wishing further, specific support or not (sensitivity 82.5%).

conclusionThe PHQ4 can be applied in this patient cohort to detect those with relevant psychological comorbidities. The cutoff value should be re-evaluated in a larger cohort as we observed that a cutoff of 6, as recommended previously, may be too high in order to detect affected patients adequately.

Indexed as

AnxietyAnxiety DisordersBrain NeoplasmsCohort StudiesDepressionDepressive DisorderFemaleHumansKarnofsky Performance StatusMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPsychometricsQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesBrain tumorCancerDistressIntracranial tumorOncologyPsychosocial burdenQuality of lifeScreening

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.