Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30904875›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled, blinded-endpoint study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pterygopalatine ganglion pulsed radiofrequency treatment for cluster headache: study protocol.

Jin Li, Hao Ren, Baoguo Wang, Dasheng Wu, Fang Luo

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03567590 (A Prospective, Multicentre, Randomized, Controlled, Blinded-endpoint Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sphenopalatine Ganglion Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment for Cluster Headache), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03567590 nacompletednot on this map

A Prospective, Multicentre, Randomized, Controlled, Blinded-endpoint Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Sphenopalatine Ganglion Pulsed Radiofrequency Treatment for Cluster Headache

TypeinterventionalSponsorBeijing Tiantan HospitalRan2018 to 2021Enrolled80ConditionsCluster HeadacheArmsPulsed Radiofrequency treatment, Nerve Block treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jin Li *Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Hao Ren *Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7422-2237
Baoguo WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Beijing Sanbo Brian Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Dasheng WuDepartment of Pain Management, Jilin Province People's Hospital, Changchun, China.
Fang LuoDepartment of Pain Management, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Capital Medical University · CNPeople 's Hospital of Jilin Province · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSingle-centre reports on small groups of patients have shown that pterygopalatine ganglion pulsed radiofrequency treatment in patients with refractory cluster headache (CH) can quickly relieve pain without significant side effects. However, a randomised controlled trial is still necessary to evaluate whether pterygopalatine ganglion pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) treatment is a viable treatment option for patients with CH who are not responding to drug treatment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This investigation is a multicentre, prospective, randomised, controlled, blinded-endpoint study. We will enrol 80 patients with CH who are not responding to medication. The enrolled patients will be randomly divided into two groups: the nerve block (NB) group and the PRF group. All patients will undergo CT-guided pterygopalatine ganglion puncture. A mixture containing steroids and local anaesthetics will be slowly injected into the patients in the NB group. The patients in the PRF group will be treated with PRF at 42°C for 360 s. After treatment, the duration of cluster periods; degree of pain during headache attacks; frequency of headache attacks; duration of each headache attack; dose of auxiliary analgesic drugs; duration of remission; degree of patient satisfaction; effectiveness rates at 1 day, 3 days, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after the procedure; and intraoperative and postoperative adverse events will be compared between the two groups. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was approved by the institutional ethics committee of the Beijing Tiantan Hospital (approval number: KY 2018-027-02). The results of the study will be published in peer-reviewed journals, and the findings will be presented at scientific meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03567590; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Ganglia, ParasympatheticNerve BlockPulsed Radiofrequency TreatmentAdolescentAdultCluster HeadacheFemaleHeadacheHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain ManagementProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignTreatment Outcomecluster headacheprotocolpulsed radiofrequencyrandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID30904875
PMCPMC6475260
OpenAlexW2924988020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.