Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30904867›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Protocol for a quasi-experimental study of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of mother and baby units compared with general psychiatric inpatient wards and crisis resolution team services (The ESMI study) in the provision of care for women in the postpartum period.

Kylee Trevillion, Rebekah Shallcross, Elizabeth Ryan, Margaret Heslin, Andrew Pickles, Sarah Byford, Ian Jones, Sonia Johnson, Susan Pawlby, Nicky Stanley and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Optimal care for mother and baby in severe postpartum mental illness.Neuropsychiatrie : Klinik, Diagnostik, Therapie und Rehabilitation : Organ der Gesellschaft Osterreichischer Nervenarzte und Psychiater · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Perinatal mental health: a review of progress and challenges.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Kylee TrevillionSection of Women's Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience at King's College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5865-4726
Rebekah ShallcrossCentre for Academic Primary Care, University of Bristol Medical School, Bristol, UK.
Elizabeth RyanBiostatistics Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience at King's College London, London, UK.
Margaret HeslinKing's Health Economics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience at King's College London, London, UK.
Andrew PicklesBiostatistics Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience at King's College London, London, UK.
Sarah ByfordKing's Health Economics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience at King's College London, London, UK.
Ian JonesNational Centre for Mental Health, Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University, London, UK.
Sonia JohnsonDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2219-1384
Susan PawlbyInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience at King's College London, London, UK.
Nicky StanleySchool of Social Work, Care and Community, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.
Diana RoseService User Research Enterprise, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience at King's College London, London, UK.
Gertrude SeneviratnePsychological Medicine and Integrated Care Clinical Academic Group, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Angelika WieckGreater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Stacey JenningsAddictions, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience at King's College London, London, UK.
Laura PottsBiostatistics Department, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience at King's College London, London, UK.
Kathryn M AbelMedical and Human Sciences, Institute of Brain Behaviour and Mental Health, Manchester, UK.
Louise M HowardSection of Women's Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience at King's College London, London, UK.
King's College London · GBCentre for Mental Health · GBGreater Manchester Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBInstitute of Mental Health · GBSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Lancashire · GB

Funding

Department of Health NIHR-RP-R3-12-011Department of Health RP-PG-1210-12002Medical Research Council MR/L010305/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionResearch into what constitutes the best and most effective care for women with an acute severe postpartum mental disorder is lacking. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of psychiatric mother and baby units (MBUs) has not been investigated systematically and there has been no direct comparison of the outcomes of mothers and infants admitted to these units, compared with those accessing generic acute psychiatric wards or crisis resolution teams (CRTs). Our primary hypothesis is that women with an acute psychiatric disorder, in the first year after giving birth, admitted to MBUs are significantly less likely to be readmitted to acute care (an MBU, CRTs or generic acute ward) in the year following discharge than women admitted to generic acute wards or cared for by CRTs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Quasi-experimental study of women accessing different types of acute psychiatric services in the first year after childbirth. Analysis of the primary outcome will be compared across the three service types, at 1-year postdischarge. Cost-effectiveness will be compared across the three service types, at 1-month and 1-year postdischarge; explored in terms of quality-adjusted life years. Secondary outcomes include unmet needs, service satisfaction, maternal adjustment, quality of mother-infant interaction. Outcomes will be analysed using propensity scoring to account for systematic differences between MBU and non-MBU participants. Analyses will take place separately within strata, defined by the propensity score, and estimates pooled to produce an average treatment effect with weights to account for cohort attrition. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has National Health Service (NHS) Ethics Approval and NHS Trust Research and Development approvals. The study has produced protocols on safeguarding maternal/child welfare. With input from our lived experience group, we have developed a dissemination strategy for academics/policy-makers/public.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisCrisis InterventionDelivery of Health CareFemaleHospitals, PsychiatricHumansMaternal-Child Health CentersMental DisordersObservational Studies as TopicPatient Care TeamPostnatal CarePregnancyPuerperal DisordersTreatment Outcomecohort studycost-effectiveness analysisperinatal mental disorderpropensity scoring

Identifiers

PMID30904867
PMCPMC6475160
OpenAlexW2923754404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.