Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30904827›Full record

Observational studyCancer epidemiology2019

Cancer fatalism and adherence to national cancer screening guidelines: Results from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL).

Patricia I Moreno, Betina Yanez, Steven J Schuetz, Katy Wortman, Linda C Gallo, Catherine Benedict, Carrie E Brintz, Jianwen Cai, Sheila F Castaneda, Krista M Perreira and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cancer epidemiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Patricia I MorenoDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.
Betina YanezDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.
Steven J SchuetzDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States; Department of Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.
Katy WortmanDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.
Linda C GalloDepartment of Psychology, San Diego State University, SDSU/UCSD Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego, CA, United States.
Catherine BenedictDepartment of Medicine, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, Manhasset, NY, United States.
Carrie E BrintzDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Jianwen CaiCollaborative Studies Coordinating Center, Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Sheila F CastanedaGraduate School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, United States.
Krista M PerreiraDepartment of Social Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Patricia GonzalezGraduate School of Public Health, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, United States.
Franklyn GonzalezCollaborative Studies Coordinating Center, Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States.
Carmen R IsasiDepartments of Epidemiology & Population Health and Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, United States.
Frank J PenedoDepartment of Psychology and Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States. Electronic address: frank.penedo@miami.edu.
Northwestern University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USSan Diego State University · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · USHofstra University · USUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

Ancillary to HCHS/SOL: Sociocultural Factors and CVD risk/prevalence in HispanicsRC2HL101649 · NHLBI · SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GALLO, LINDA C, LLABRE, MARIA MAGDALENA · 2009 to 2010
$4.7M
Cancer Prevention, Control, and Survivorship Research Training ProgramT32CA193193 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Brian L Hitsman, BETINA YANEZ · 2015 to 2026
$3.8M
Thalassemia Clinical Research Network, CanadaU01HL065233 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY HEALTH NETWORK · PI OLIVIERI, NANCY F · 2000 to 2009
$2.6M
GENETIC ARCHITECTURE OF PLASMA T-PA AND PAI-1R01HL065234 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI MOORE, JASON H. · 2000 to 2004
$1.7M
HISPANIC COMMUNITY HEALTH STUDY-268065233N01HC065233 · HC · COORDINATING CENTER · PI CHAMBLESS, LLOYD E · 2006 to 2006
–
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA193193NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HC065233NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HC065234NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HC065235NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HC065236NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HC065237NHLBI NIH HHS RC2 HL101649
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSociocultural factors, such as health insurance status, income, education, and acculturation, predict cancer screening among U.S. Hispanics/Latinos. However, these factors can be difficult to modify. More research is needed to identify individual-level modifiable factors that may improve screening and subsequent cancer outcomes in this population. The aim of this study was to examine cancer fatalism (i.e., the belief that there is little or nothing one can do to lower his/her risk of developing cancer) as a determinant of adherence to national screening guidelines for colorectal, breast, prostate, and cervical cancer among Hispanics/Latinos.

methodsParticipants were from the multi-site Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL) Sociocultural Ancillary Study (N = 5313). The National Cancer Institute (NCI) Health Interview National Trends Survey was used to assess cancer fatalism and receipt of cancer screening. Adherence was defined as following screening guidelines from United States Preventive Services Task Force and the American Cancer Society during the study period.

resultsAdjusting for well-established determinants of cancer screening and covariates (health insurance status, income, education, acculturation, age, Hispanic/Latino background), lower cancer fatalism was marginally associated with greater adherence to screening for colorectal (OR 1.13, 95% CI [.99-1.30], p = .07), breast (OR 1.16, 95% CI [.99-1.36], p = .08) and prostate cancer (OR 1.18, 95% CI [.97-1.43], p = .10), but not cervical cancer.

conclusionsThe associations of cancer fatalism were small and marginal, underlining that sociocultural factors are more robust determinants of cancer screening adherence among Hispanics/Latinos.

Indexed as

AcculturationAdultAgedEarly Detection of CancerFemaleGuideline AdherenceHispanic or LatinoHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPublic HealthRisk FactorsUnited StatesAdherenceCancer preventionCancer screeningFatalismHealth beliefsHispanicLatino

Identifiers

PMID30904827
PMCPMC10424711
OpenAlexW2924104786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.