Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30904814›Full record

ArticleSocial science & medicine (1982)2019

Channeling hope: An ethnographic study of how research encounters become meaningful for families suffering from genetic disease in Pakistan.

Zainab Afshan Sheikh, Anja M B Jensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social science & medicine (1982), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zainab Afshan SheikhSection for Health Services Research, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Denmark. Electronic address: zash@sund.ku.dk.
Anja M B JensenSection for Health Services Research, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Pakistani population has become particularly interesting for international genetic research due to its high rates of consanguinity. Based on 5 months fieldwork in Faisalabad among Pakistani genetic researchers from December 2015-January 2016 and February-April 2017 and interviews with 36 families and 14 researchers, this article focuses on research encounters. It demonstrates how genetic research figures in the lives of families affected by genetic medical conditions in light of their everyday struggles with disease, and considers their perspectives on destiny and hope. Through examining the potentials of the research encounter, we ask how research becomes meaningful in the lives of Pakistani families affected by genetic disease: how these families and individuals enable different modes of sharing tragic stories, contemplating hope and contesting logics of consanguinity. International genetic research depends on human raw material. If we wish to understand the precarious lives this research relies on, then the everyday struggles with disease, and the perspectives of families must be methodologically and theoretically engaged.

Indexed as

Researcher-Subject RelationsAdolescentAnthropology, CulturalChildChild, PreschoolChildren with DisabilitiesConsanguinityGenetic Diseases, InbornHumansInterviews as TopicPakistanPhilosophyQualitative ResearchDestinyEthnographyHopeInternational genetic researchPakistanResearch encountersResearch participationSuffering

Identifiers

PMID30904814
PMCPMC6481513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.