Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30903801›Full record

ArticleMaternal & child nutrition2019

Gestational weight gain and newborn anthropometric outcomes in rural Bangladesh.

Gilberto Kac, Charles D Arnold, Susana L Matias, Malay K Mridha, Kathryn G Dewey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal & child nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Prenatal multiple micronutrient supplementation is associated with improved maternal gestational weight gain: A prospective longitudinal study in Parepare, Indonesia.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Factors Predicting Fetal Growth Restriction and Fetal Cardiac Remodeling.International journal of general medicine · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gilberto KacInstitute of Nutrition, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8603-9077
Charles D ArnoldDepartment of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, Davis, California.ORCID 0000-0001-6510-3172
Susana L MatiasDepartment of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, Davis, California.
Malay K MridhaCenter for Non-communicable Diseases and Nutrition, BRAC James P Grant School of Public Health, BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Kathryn G DeweyDepartment of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, Davis, California.ORCID 0000-0002-4185-3451

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low gestational weight gain (GWG) is a known predictor of fetal growth restriction in higher income countries, but there is little information on this association in lower income countries. Our objective is to describe the association between GWG and birth outcomes among pregnant women in rural Bangladesh. Pregnant women were identified in a community-based programme and enrolled into the study at an average of 13 weeks' gestation (n = 4,011). Maternal weight and height were measured at enrolment, maternal weight was measured at 36 weeks' gestation, and newborns were measured after birth. Rate of GWG (g/weeks) was calculated, and women were categorized as having adequate or inadequate GWG (Institute of Medicine recommendations). Newborn anthropometric outcomes included weight-for-age z score (WAZ), length-for-age z score (LAZ), head-circumference-for-age z score (HCZ), body mass index (BMI)-for-age z score (BMIZ), low birthweight (LBW < 2,500 g), WAZ < -2, LAZ < -2, HCZ < -2, BMIZ < -2, and small for gestational age (SGA: <10th percentile). Multivariate models were adjusted for confounders. Only 26% of the 2,562 women in these analyses had adequate GWG. Compared with newborns of women with inadequate GWG, infants of women with adequate GWG had a lower risk of adverse anthropometric outcomes (relative risk [95% confidence interval]: LBW = 0.68 [0.59, 0.80], LAZ < -2 = 0.64 [0.51, 0.80], HCZ < -2 = 0.75 [0.60, 0.93], BMIZ < -2 = 0.70 [0.59, 0.83], and SGA = 0.80 [0.73, 0.86]), but there was no significant difference in mean (SE) duration of gestation, 39.7 (0.08) versus 39.7 (0.05) weeks. In this population, GWG rate is a strong predictor of newborn anthropometric outcomes, but not duration of gestation.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBangladeshBirth WeightBody Mass IndexCohort StudiesFemaleGestational AgeGestational Weight GainHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, Small for Gestational AgePregnancyRural PopulationYoung Adultbody mass indexgestational agegestational weight gainlow birthweightsmall for gestational agestunting

Identifiers

PMID30903801
PMCPMC6859981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.