Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30903694›Full record

ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2019

Imaging P-Glycoprotein Function at the Blood-Brain Barrier as a Determinant of the Variability in Response to Central Nervous System Drugs.

Martin Bauer, Nicolas Tournier, Oliver Langer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Pathophysiology of Status Epilepticus Revisited.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. First-in-human evaluation of 6-bromo-7-[European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  8. [Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. [Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Comparative vulnerability of PET radioligands to partial inhibition of P-glycoprotein at the blood-brain barrier: A criterion of choice?Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2022
    Article
  18. Understanding the brain uptake and permeability of small molecules through the BBB: A technical overview.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Martin BauerDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Nicolas TournierUMR 1023 IMIV, Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, CEA, Inserm, Université Paris Sud, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France.
Oliver LangerDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF KLI 694
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

AnimalsATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1Blood-Brain BarrierCentral Nervous System AgentsHumansPositron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1Central Nervous System AgentsRadiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

PMID30903694
PMCPMC6491962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.