Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30903592›Full record

ArticleBulletin of mathematical biology2019

A Mathematical Framework for Modelling the Metastatic Spread of Cancer.

Linnea C Franssen, Tommaso Lorenzi, Andrew E F Burgess, Mark A J Chaplain

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of mathematical biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 103 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Tissue stresses caused by invasive tumour: a biomechanical model.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A computational model for the cancer field effect.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Linnea C FranssenSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK. lcf4@st-andrews.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-9636-0283
Tommaso LorenziSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.
Andrew E F BurgessDivision of Mathematics, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Mark A J ChaplainSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.
University of St Andrews · GBUniversity of Dundee · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is a complex disease that starts with mutations of key genes in one cell or a small group of cells at a primary site in the body. If these cancer cells continue to grow successfully and, at some later stage, invade the surrounding tissue and acquire a vascular network, they can spread to distant secondary sites in the body. This process, known as metastatic spread, is responsible for around 90% of deaths from cancer and is one of the so-called hallmarks of cancer. To shed light on the metastatic process, we present a mathematical modelling framework that captures for the first time the interconnected processes of invasion and metastatic spread of individual cancer cells in a spatially explicit manner-a multigrid, hybrid, individual-based approach. This framework accounts for the spatiotemporal evolution of mesenchymal- and epithelial-like cancer cells, membrane-type-1 matrix metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP) and the diffusible matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2), and for their interactions with the extracellular matrix. Using computational simulations, we demonstrate that our model captures all the key steps of the invasion-metastasis cascade, i.e. invasion by both heterogeneous cancer cell clusters and by single mesenchymal-like cancer cells; intravasation of these clusters and single cells both via active mechanisms mediated by matrix-degrading enzymes (MDEs) and via passive shedding; circulation of cancer cell clusters and single cancer cells in the vasculature with the associated risk of cell death and disaggregation of clusters; extravasation of clusters and single cells; and metastatic growth at distant secondary sites in the body. By faithfully reproducing experimental results, our simulations support the evidence-based hypothesis that the membrane-bound MT1-MMP is the main driver of invasive spread rather than diffusible MDEs such as MMP-2.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm MetastasisAnimalsBreast NeoplasmsCell CommunicationComputer SimulationEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionFemaleHumansMaleMathematical ConceptsMatrix Metalloproteinase 14Matrix Metalloproteinase 2Neoplastic Cells, CirculatingNeoplastic Stem CellsMatrix Metalloproteinase 14Matrix Metalloproteinase 2MMP14 protein, humanMMP2 protein, humanIndividual-based modelMathematical oncologyMetastatic spreadMultigrid frameworkTumour microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID30903592
PMCPMC6503893
OpenAlexW2949880289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.