Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30903541›Full record

ArticleNeuroinformatics2019

Independent Multiple Factor Association Analysis for Multiblock Data in Imaging Genetics.

Natalia Vilor-Tejedor, Mohammad Arfan Ikram, Gennady V Roshchupkin, Alejandro Cáceres, Silvia Alemany, Meike W Vernooij, Wiro J Niessen, Cornelia M van Duijn, Jordi Sunyer, Hieab H Adams and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroinformatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Advancing global dementia research through equity and inclusion.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Multivariate Analysis and Modelling of multiple Brain endOphenotypes: Let's MAMBO!Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Natalia Vilor-TejedorCentre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute for Science and Technology., C. Doctor Aiguader 88, Edif. PRBB, 08003, Barcelona, Spain. natalia.vilortejedor@crg.eu.ORCID 0000-0003-4935-6721
Mohammad Arfan IkramDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Gennady V RoshchupkinDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Alejandro CáceresBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain.
Silvia AlemanyBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain.
Meike W VernooijDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Wiro J NiessenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Cornelia M van DuijnDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Jordi SunyerBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain.
Hieab H AdamsDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Juan R GonzálezBarcelona Institute for Global Health (ISGlobal), Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multivariate methods have the potential to better capture complex relationships that may exist between different biological levels. Multiple Factor Analysis (MFA) is one of the most popular methods to obtain factor scores and measures of discrepancy between data sets. However, singular value decomposition in MFA is based on PCA, which is adequate only if the data is normally distributed, linear or stationary. In addition, including strongly correlated variables can overemphasize the contribution of the estimated components. In this work, we introduced a novel method referred as Independent Multifactorial Analysis (ICA-MFA) to derive relevant features from multiscale data. This method is an extended implementation of MFA, where the component value decomposition is based on Independent Component Analysis. In addition, ICA-MFA incorporates a predictive step based on an Independent Component Regression. We evaluated and compared the performance of ICA-MFA with both, the MFA method and traditional univariate analyses, in a simulation study. We showed how ICA-MFA explained up to 10-fold more variance than MFA and univariate methods. We applied the proposed algorithm in a study of 4057 individuals belonging to the population-based Rotterdam Study with available genetic and neuroimaging data, as well as information about executive cognitive functioning. Specifically, we used ICA-MFA to detect relevant genetic features related to structural brain regions, which in turn were involved, in the mechanisms of executive cognitive function. The proposed strategy makes it possible to determine the degree to which the whole set of genetic and/or neuroimaging markers contribute to the variability of the symptomatology jointly, rather than individually. While univariate results and MFA combinations only explained a limited proportion of variance (less than 2%), our method increased the explained variance (10%) and allowed the identification of significant components that maximize the variance explained in the model. The potential application of the ICA-MFA algorithm constitutes an important aspect of integrating multivariate multiscale data, specifically in the field of Neurogenetics.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBrainFactor Analysis, StatisticalHumansNeuroimagingPolymorphism, Single NucleotideData integrationICA-MFAImaging geneticsModellingNeurogenetics

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.