Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30903512›Full record

ReviewAmbio2020

Governing evolution: A socioecological comparison of resistance management for insecticidal transgenic Bt crops among four countries.

Yves Carrière, Zachary S Brown, Sharon J Downes, Govind Gujar, Graham Epstein, Celso Omoto, Nicholas P Storer, David Mota-Sanchez, Peter Søgaard Jørgensen, Scott P Carroll

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ambio, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. The socio-economic challenges of managing pathogen evolution in agriculture.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Crop rotation mitigates impacts of corn rootworm resistance to transgenic Bt corn.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yves CarrièreDepartment of Entomology, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA. ycarrier@ag.arizona.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7730-9629
Zachary S BrownDepartment of Agricultural and Resource Economics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA.
Sharon J DownesCSIRO Agriculture and Food, Narrabri, Australia.
Govind GujarSouth Asia Biotechnology Centre, New Delhi, India.
Graham EpsteinSchool of Environment, Resources and Sustainability, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada.
Celso OmotoDepartment of Entomology and Acarology, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Nicholas P StorerCorteva AgriscienceTM, Agriculture Division of DowDuPont, Wilmington, USA.
David Mota-SanchezDepartment of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA.
Peter Søgaard JørgensenGlobal Economic Dynamics and the Biosphere, Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences, Lilla Frescativägen 4a, 10405, Stockholm, Sweden.
Scott P CarrollDepartment of Entomology and Nematology, University of California at Davis, Davis, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2094-9398

Funding

Department of Agriculture (USDA) Biotechnology Risk Assessment Grant 2014-33522-22214National Science Foundation DBI-1639145USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture HATCH project #NC02520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cooperative management of pest susceptibility to transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) crops is pursued worldwide in a variety of forms and to varying degrees of success depending on context. We examine this context using a comparative socioecological analysis of resistance management in Australia, Brazil, India, and the United States. We find that a shared understanding of resistance risks among government regulators, growers, and other actors is critical for effective governance. Furthermore, monitoring of grower compliance with resistance management requirements, surveillance of resistance, and mechanisms to support rapid implementation of remedial actions are essential to achieve desirable outcomes. Mandated resistance management measures, strong coordination between actors, and direct linkages between the group that appraises resistance risks and growers also appear to enhance prospects for effective governance. Our analysis highlights factors that could improve current governance systems and inform other initiatives to conserve susceptibility as a contribution to the cause of public good.

Indexed as

Bacillus thuringiensisAustraliaBrazilIndiaInsecticide ResistancePest Control, BiologicalPlants, Genetically ModifiedUnited StatesBacillus thuringiensis cropsConservation and monitoringInstitutional analysis and developmentSustainabilityTransgenic crops

Identifiers

PMID30903512
PMCPMC6889122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.