Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30903459›Full record

Trial reportJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2019

Prospective randomized comparative study on rivaroxaban and LMWH for prophylaxis of post-apheresis thrombosis in adoptive T cell immunotherapy cancer patients.

Xiaoli Wang, Shuo Wang, Michael A Morse, Ni Jiang, Yanjie Zhao, Yuguang Song, Lei Zhou, Hongyan Huang, Xinna Zhou, Amy Hobeika and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03282643 (Rivaroxaban Versus Low-molecular-weight Heparin in Preventing Thrombosis Among Cancer Patients After Femoral Venepuncture), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03282643 phase1 / phase2completednot on this map

Rivaroxaban Versus Low-molecular-weight Heparin in Preventing Thrombosis Among Cancer Patients After Femoral Venepuncture

TypeinterventionalSponsorCapital Medical UniversityRan2016 to 2019Enrolled74ConditionsNeoplasmsArmsRivaroxaban 10 MG, Rivaroxaban 20 MG, Low-molecular-weight heparin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Direct oral anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiaoli WangBeijing Key Laboratory for Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines, Department of Medical Oncology, Capital Medical University Cancer Center, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 10 Tieyi Road, Beijing, 100038, China.
Shuo WangBeijing Key Laboratory for Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines, Department of Medical Oncology, Capital Medical University Cancer Center, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 10 Tieyi Road, Beijing, 100038, China.
Michael A MorseDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, 203 Research Drive, Suite 433, Box 2606, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Ni JiangBeijing Key Laboratory for Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines, Department of Medical Oncology, Capital Medical University Cancer Center, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 10 Tieyi Road, Beijing, 100038, China.
Yanjie ZhaoBeijing Key Laboratory for Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines, Department of Medical Oncology, Capital Medical University Cancer Center, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 10 Tieyi Road, Beijing, 100038, China.
Yuguang SongBeijing Key Laboratory for Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines, Department of Medical Oncology, Capital Medical University Cancer Center, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 10 Tieyi Road, Beijing, 100038, China.
Lei ZhouBeijing Key Laboratory for Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines, Department of Medical Oncology, Capital Medical University Cancer Center, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 10 Tieyi Road, Beijing, 100038, China.
Hongyan HuangBeijing Key Laboratory for Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines, Department of Medical Oncology, Capital Medical University Cancer Center, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 10 Tieyi Road, Beijing, 100038, China.
Xinna ZhouBeijing Key Laboratory for Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines, Department of Medical Oncology, Capital Medical University Cancer Center, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 10 Tieyi Road, Beijing, 100038, China.
Amy HobeikaDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, 203 Research Drive, Suite 433, Box 2606, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Jun RenBeijing Key Laboratory for Therapeutic Cancer Vaccines, Department of Medical Oncology, Capital Medical University Cancer Center, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, 10 Tieyi Road, Beijing, 100038, China. jun.ren@duke.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5399-000X
Herbert Kim LyerlyDepartment of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, 203 Research Drive, Suite 433, Box 2606, Durham, NC, 27710, USA. kim.lyerly@duke.edu.
Capital Medical University · CNDuke Medical Center · USDuke University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autologous adoptive T cell immunotherapy has been recognized as an effective treatment for cancer patients. The initial qualified lymphocytes is the core element determining the immunotherapeutic outcomes clinically. Cell separator based apheresis procedure is an optimal procedure to collect adequate mono-nucleated lymphocytes to generate efficient ex vivo T cell expansions; however, potential catheter-associated femoral vein thrombosis at post-apheresis might rise an additional deteriorated morbidity for cancer patients. The emerging prophylactic medications are required at such circumstances. Therefore this study was designed to compare the prophylactic effects of rivaroxaban versus low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in patients who had exposed during the femoral vein catheterization for apheresis. 74 Patients were randomized 1:1:1 into three groups: subcutaneous injection of LMWH, Fraxiparine (n = 23) (0.4 ml, 3800 IU/day) for 2 days, oral rivaroxaban 10 mg/d (n = 26), and oral rivaroxaban 20 mg/d (n = 25) for consecutive 2 days. The primary endpoint was to compare the venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurrence cases in one month post catheterization. There were 4 cases confirmed VTE occurrence in LMWH group with contrast to 1 case in rivaroxaban 10 mg administration group. None was seen in rivaroxaban 20 mg group (P = 0.02 as the comparison with LMWH). Meantime there was no bleeding events occurrence afterwards. Oral rivaroxaban 20 mg/day was recommendable to be considered which superior to LMWH. Although these limited data and patient volume reached the statistical difference which was able to provide the evidence proofed to compare the potency of those two anticoagulants, it could be regarded as the preliminary data provide the clinical results for cancer patients who were placed in the condition of apheresis and subsequently undergone adoptive T cell immunotherapy.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03282643. Registered 16 February 2016, http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov/ NCT03282643.

Indexed as

Adoptive TransferBlood Component RemovalAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHeparin, Low-Molecular-WeightHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsProspective StudiesRivaroxabanThrombosisT-LymphocytesHeparin, Low-Molecular-WeightRivaroxabanCancerFemoral vein thrombosisImmunotherapyLow molecular weight heparinRivaroxaban

Identifiers

PMID30903459
OpenAlexW2940393761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.