Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30903425›Full record

SynthesisObesity surgery2019

Mid-long-term Revisional Surgery After Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Bingsheng Guan, Tsz Hong Chong, Juzheng Peng, Yanya Chen, Cunchuan Wang, Jingge Yang

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Obesity surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05194943 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Trends and Safety in Revisional Bariatric Surgery in Italy: a High Volume Multicenter, Observational Longitudinal Study (RBST)

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of Roma La SapienzaRan2021 to 2022Enrolled500ConditionsObesity, Morbid, Bariatric Surgery Candidate, Remission, Complication,PostoperativeArmsrevisional bariatric surgical procedures
NCT05608772 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Conversion of Failed Sleeve Gastrectomy Due to Weight Regain to SADI-S, RYGB or OAGB

TypeinterventionalSponsorGeneral Committee of Teaching Hospitals and Institutes, EgyptRan2023 to 2028Enrolled234ConditionsWeight Loss, Bariatric Surgery Candidate, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions, Nutrient DeficiencyArmsrevision surgery
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bingsheng GuanDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Tsz Hong ChongDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Juzheng PengDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Yanya ChenDepartment of Nursing Science, School of Nursing, Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510632, China.
Cunchuan WangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Jingge YangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China. dryangjg@126.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5510-8241

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to make a meta-analysis regarding mid-long-term outcomes (≥ 3-year follow-up) after sleeve gastrectomy (SG), focusing on incidence, reasons, and results of revisional surgery. PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched and 32 studies were included. The overall revision rate was 10.4%, but for patients with ≥ 10-year follow-up, the rate was 22.6%. European studies had a higher revision rate (14.4%) than other studies. The most common reason for revision was failure in weight loss, and the most frequent revisional procedure was gastric bypass. Revisional surgery was favorable for weight reduction and comorbidity resolution. In conclusion, revision rate is not rare after SG, especially when looking at long-term follow-up. Bariatric surgeons and patients need to fully understand and deal with the need for revision after SG.

Indexed as

ReoperationComorbidityGastrectomyGastric BypassHumansLaparoscopyObesity, MorbidPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeWeight LossMeta-analysisMid-long-termRevisional surgerySleeve gastrectomySystematic review

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.