Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30903393›Full record

SynthesisInternational urology and nephrology2019

A systematic review of the long-term efficacy of low-intensity shockwave therapy for vasculogenic erectile dysfunction.

Oliver Brunckhorst, Lauren Wells, Fiona Teeling, Gordon Muir, Asif Muneer, Kamran Ahmed

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International urology and nephrology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Oliver BrunckhorstMRC Centre for Transplantation, Guy's Hospital Campus, King's College London, King's Health Partners, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
Lauren WellsMRC Centre for Transplantation, Guy's Hospital Campus, King's College London, King's Health Partners, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
Fiona TeelingMRC Centre for Transplantation, Guy's Hospital Campus, King's College London, King's Health Partners, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
Gordon MuirMRC Centre for Transplantation, Guy's Hospital Campus, King's College London, King's Health Partners, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
Asif MuneerDepartment of Urology, University College Hospital, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Kamran AhmedMRC Centre for Transplantation, Guy's Hospital Campus, King's College London, King's Health Partners, London, SE1 9RT, UK. kamran.ahmed@kcl.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo look at the evidence base for LISWT as a treatment modality for vasculogenic erectile dysfunction, focusing on the long-term outcomes at over 6 months following treatment.

methodsA systematic literature search was conducted utilising MEDLINE and Scopus databases from 2010 to September 2018 by two independent reviewers. Outcome measures extracted for long-term efficacy included International Index of Erectile Function scores and Erection Hardness Scores. Subgroup analysis for LISWT effectiveness included age, PDE5i responsiveness, presence of vascular co-morbidities and smoking status.

resultsThe search identified eleven studies, representing a total of 799 patients. Nine studies found a significant improvement in erectile function after LISWT at 6-month follow-up (median IIEF-EF improvement in 5.3 at 6 months). However, of five studies assessing erectile function at 12 months; two identified a plateauing of results, with three a deterioration (IIEF-EF score changes of - 2 to 0.1 from 6 months). Erectile function did, however, remain above baseline results in all of these studies. Subgroup analysis revealed increasing age to reduce the response to LISWT treatment. Whilst ED severity, PDE5i responsiveness and co-morbidities potentially influence effectiveness, results are still inconsistent.

conclusionsLISWT may be a safe and acceptable potential ED treatment with demonstrated benefits at 6 months. There is some question regarding efficacy deterioration beyond this, but there is still a demonstrated benefit seen even at 12 months post treatment. However, quality of evidence remains low with larger multiinstitutional studies required, standardising confounders such as shockwave administration and oral medication use.

Indexed as

Extracorporeal Shockwave TherapyHumansImpotence, VasculogenicMaleTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeErectile dysfunctionExtracorporeal shockwave therapyVasculogenic impotence

Identifiers

PMID30903393
PMCPMC6499893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.