Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30903319›Full record

ReviewJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2019

Controlling metastatic cancer: the role of phytochemicals in cell signaling.

Andrea Kapinova, Peter Kubatka, Alena Liskova, Denis Baranenko, Peter Kruzliak, Milan Matta, Dietrich Büsselberg, Bibiana Malicherova, Anthony Zulli, Taeg Kyu Kwon and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Plant-Derived Anti-Cancer Therapeutics and Biopharmaceuticals.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Frontiers in oncology · 2024
    Article
  8. Mechanisms of action ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Screening ofFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Article
  17. Anti-Tumor Activity ofAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 6 countries.

Andrea KapinovaBiomedical Center Martin, Division of Oncology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, Martin, Slovakia.
Peter KubatkaBiomedical Center Martin, Division of Oncology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, Martin, Slovakia. kubatka@jfmed.uniba.sk.
Alena LiskovaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine and Martin University Hospital, Comenius University in Bratislava, Martin, Slovakia.
Denis BaranenkoInternational Research Centre "Biotechnologies of the Third Millennium", ITMO University, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation.
Peter KruzliakDepartment of Internal Medicine, Brothers of Mercy Hospital, Polní 3, 639 00, Brno, Czech Republic. kruzliakpeter@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7069-3784
Milan MattaDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Pavol Jozef Safarik University and University Hospital, Kosice, Slovakia.
Dietrich BüsselbergDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, Weill Cornell College of Medicine, Education City, Qatar Foundation, Doha, Qatar.
Bibiana MalicherovaBiomedical Center Martin, Division of Oncology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, Martin, Slovakia.
Anthony ZulliInstitute for Health and Sport (IHES), Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia.
Taeg Kyu KwonDepartment of Immunology, School of Medicine, Keimyung University, Daegu, South Korea.
Eva JezkovaDepartment of Histology and Embryology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, Martin, Slovakia.
Dana BlahutovaDepartment of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Education, Catholic University in Ruzomberok, Ruzomberok, Slovakia.
Pavol ZuborBiomedical Center Martin, Division of Oncology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava, Martin, Slovakia.
Jan DankoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine and Martin University Hospital, Comenius University in Bratislava, Martin, Slovakia.
Comenius University Bratislava · SKMartin University Hospital · SKCatholic University in Ruzomberok · SKITMO University · RUKeimyung University · KRMasaryk University · CZUniversity of Pavol Jozef Šafárik · SKVictoria University · AUWeill Cornell Medical College in Qatar · QA

Funding

Agentúra Ministerstva Školstva, Vedy, Výskumu a Športu SR VEGA 1/0124/17Agentúra Ministerstva Školstva, Vedy, Výskumu a Športu SR VEGA 1/0136/19
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCancer is a serious health issue and a leading cause of death worldwide. Most of the cancer patients (approximately 90%) do not die from the consequences of the primary tumor development, but due to a heavily treatable metastatic invasion. During the lengthy multistep process of carcinogenesis, there are a lot of opportunities available to reverse or slow down the tissue invasion or the process of tumor metastasis formation.

resultsCurrent research has brought many promising results from anti-metastatic experimental studies, and has shown that chemoprevention by natural or semisynthetic phytochemicals with plethora of biological activities could be one of the potentially effective options in the fight against this problem. However, there is a lack of clinical trials to confirm these findings. In this review, we focused on summarization and discussion of the general features of metastatic cancer, and recent preclinical and clinical studies dealing with anti-metastatic potential of various plant-derived compounds.

conclusionsBased on our findings, we can conclude and confirm our hypothesis that phytochemicals with pleiotropic anticancer effects can be very useful in retarding and/or reversing the metastasis process, and can also be used to prevent tissue invasion and metastases. But, further studies in this area are certainly necessary and desirable.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBiomarkersChemopreventionClinical Studies as TopicDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalDrug Resistance, NeoplasmEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasmsNeoplasm StagingPhytochemicalsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicBiomarkersPhytochemicalsChemopreventionMetastatic cancerPhytochemicalsSignaling pathwaysTherapy

Identifiers

PMID30903319
PMCPMC11810423
OpenAlexW2940825265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.