Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30903298›Full record

ReviewCurrent allergy and asthma reports2019

Evaluating Penicillin Allergies Without Skin Testing.

Taylor A Banks, Mark Tucker, Eric Macy

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current allergy and asthma reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04408508 (Safety and Efficacy of an Oral Penicillin Challenge in Low Risk Hospitalized Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04408508 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Safety and Efficacy of an Oral Penicillin Challenge in Low Risk Hospitalized Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorSaskatchewan Health Authority - Regina AreaRan2023 to 2024Enrolled50ConditionsPenicillin AllergyArmsAmoxicillin 250 MG
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 92 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021.MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2021
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Proactive Penicillin Allergy Delabeling: Lessons Learned From a Quality Improvement Project.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Resource utilization and cost assessment of a proactive penicillin allergy de-labeling program for low-risk inpatients.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Don't we overestimate drug allergies in children?International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health · 2023
    Article
  9. Penicillin de-labelling in vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: comparison of approaches, outcomes and future directions.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2023
    Article
  10. Management of the Pregnant Patient with Beta-Lactam Allergy.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. The Penicillin Allergy Delabeling Program: A Multicenter Whole-of-Hospital Health Services Intervention and Comparative Effectiveness Study.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Article
  17. Penicillin Allergy Testing Is Cost-Saving: An Economic Evaluation Study.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Penicillin Allergy Assessment in Pregnancy: Safety and Impact on Antibiotic Use.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2021
    Article
  20. Penicillin Allergy Delabeling Can Decrease Antibiotic Resistance, Reduce Costs, and Optimize Patient Outcomes.Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Taylor A BanksDivision of Allergy/Immunology, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, VA, USA.
Mark TuckerDepartment of Allergy and Immunology, Naval Branch Health Clinic, San Diego, CA, USA.
Eric MacyDepartment of Allergy, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Kaiser Permanente, 7060 Clairemont Mesa Blvd, San Diego, CA, 92111, USA. eric.m.macy@kp.org.
Kaiser Permanente · USNaval Medical Center Portsmouth · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewAn unconfirmed penicillin allergy is known to confer significant risk to patients. Only a small minority of patients labeled with penicillin allergy will be confirmed to be hypersensitive with the current reference standard test, an oral amoxicillin therapeutic dose challenge. Skin testing has been recommended prior to oral challenges to reduce the risk of severe acute challenge reactions. The rate of severe acute anaphylactic reactions with oral amoxicillin is currently extremely low. Unfortunately, penicillin skin testing, as commonly performed, has a high rate of false positive results. RECENT

findingsEncouraging skin testing in all individuals with an unconfirmed penicillin allergy, prior to a confirmatory oral challenge, would be technically difficult, make testing all individuals with an unconfirmed penicillin allergy very unlikely, and ultimately increase the risk to patients because of suboptimal antibiotic use. Most patients, who are appropriate candidates for a direct oral amoxicillin challenge, to confirm current penicillin tolerance, can be safely identified by their clinical histories. Higher risk individuals, those with a history of anaphylaxis or other acute onset potentially IgE-mediated reaction such as hives within 6 h of the first dose of the last course of a penicillin, may benefit from properly performed puncture and intradermal skin testing, using commercially available penicilloyl-polylysine, prior to an oral challenge, if skin test negative. Direct oral amoxicillin challenges in low-risk individuals are well accepted by patients and a safe and effective part of penicillin allergy delabeling.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHumansPenicillinsSkin TestsPenicillinsAdverse drug reactionAmoxicillinAntibiotic stewardship programDelabelingDrug allergyHypersensitivityOral challengePenicillinSkin testing

Identifiers

PMID30903298
OpenAlexW2924126028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.