SynthesisBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2019
Differential proteostatic regulation of insoluble and abundant proteins.
Synthesis in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Thioredoxin Fold Protein (TFP2) from Extreme AcidophilicInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Bacterial Protein Homeostasis Disruption as a Therapeutic Intervention.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021Review
- Autonomous aggregation suppression by acidic residues explains why chaperones favour basic residues.The EMBO journal · 2020Article
- Protein Homeostasis Database: protein quality control in E.coli.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationDespite intense effort, it has been difficult to explain chaperone dependencies of proteins from sequence or structural properties.
resultsWe constructed a database collecting all publicly available data of experimental chaperone interaction and dependency data for the Escherichia coli proteome, and enriched it with an extensive set of protein-specific as well as cell-context-dependent proteostatic parameters. Employing this new resource, we performed a comprehensive meta-analysis of the key determinants of chaperone interaction. Our study confirms that GroEL client proteins are biased toward insoluble proteins of low abundance, but for client proteins of the Trigger Factor/DnaK axis, we instead find that cellular parameters such as high protein abundance, translational efficiency and mRNA turnover are key determinants. We experimentally confirmed the finding that chaperone dependence is a function of translation rate and not protein-intrinsic parameters by tuning chaperone dependence of Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) in E.coli by synonymous mutations only. The juxtaposition of both protein-intrinsic and cell-contextual chaperone triage mechanisms explains how the E.coli proteome achieves combining reliable production of abundant and conserved proteins, while also enabling the evolution of diverging metabolic functions. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The database will be made available via http://phdb.switchlab.org. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.