Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30903139›Full record

ReviewEuropean heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging2019

Myocardial strain imaging: review of general principles, validation, and sources of discrepancies.

M S Amzulescu, M De Craene, H Langet, A Pasquet, D Vancraeynest, A C Pouleur, J L Vanoverschelde, B L Gerber

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05376254 (Three-Dimensional Assessment of Right Ventricular Function in Patients Undergoing Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation), which is not on this map. Cited by 255 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
255citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
44.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05376254 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Three-Dimensional Assessment of Right Ventricular Function in Patients Undergoing Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of AlbertaRan2022 to 2027Enrolled200ConditionsHeart Failure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

255 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 465 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

195 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

M S AmzulescuDivision of Cardiology, Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Cliniques Universitaires St. Luc, Pôle de Recherche Cardiovasculaire (CARD), Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Université Catholique de Louvain, Av Hippocrate 10/2806, B Brussels, Belgium.
M De CraenePhilips Research, Medical Imaging (Medisys), 33 rue de Verdun, CS60055, Suresnes Cedex, France.
H LangetClinical Research Board, Philips Research, 33 rue de Verdun, CS60055, Suresnes Cedex, France.
A PasquetDivision of Cardiology, Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Cliniques Universitaires St. Luc, Pôle de Recherche Cardiovasculaire (CARD), Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Université Catholique de Louvain, Av Hippocrate 10/2806, B Brussels, Belgium.
D VancraeynestDivision of Cardiology, Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Cliniques Universitaires St. Luc, Pôle de Recherche Cardiovasculaire (CARD), Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Université Catholique de Louvain, Av Hippocrate 10/2806, B Brussels, Belgium.
A C PouleurDivision of Cardiology, Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Cliniques Universitaires St. Luc, Pôle de Recherche Cardiovasculaire (CARD), Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Université Catholique de Louvain, Av Hippocrate 10/2806, B Brussels, Belgium.
J L VanoverscheldeDivision of Cardiology, Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Cliniques Universitaires St. Luc, Pôle de Recherche Cardiovasculaire (CARD), Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Université Catholique de Louvain, Av Hippocrate 10/2806, B Brussels, Belgium.
B L GerberDivision of Cardiology, Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, Cliniques Universitaires St. Luc, Pôle de Recherche Cardiovasculaire (CARD), Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Université Catholique de Louvain, Av Hippocrate 10/2806, B Brussels, Belgium.
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc · BEUCLouvain · BEPhilips (France) · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myocardial tissue tracking imaging techniques have been developed for a more accurate evaluation of myocardial deformation (i.e. strain), with the potential to overcome the limitations of ejection fraction (EF) and to contribute, incremental to EF, to the diagnosis and prognosis in cardiac diseases. While most of the deformation imaging techniques are based on the similar principles of detecting and tracking specific patterns within an image, there are intra- and inter-imaging modality inconsistencies limiting the wide clinical applicability of strain. In this review, we aimed to describe the particularities of the echocardiographic and cardiac magnetic resonance deformation techniques, in order to understand the discrepancies in strain measurement, focusing on the potential sources of variation: related to the software used to analyse the data, to the different physics of image acquisition and the different principles of 2D vs. 3D approaches. As strain measurements are not interchangeable, it is highly desirable to work with validated strain assessment tools, in order to derive information from evidence-based data. There is, however, a lack of solid validation of the current tissue tracking techniques, as only a few of the commercial deformation imaging softwares have been properly investigated. We have, therefore, addressed in this review the neglected issue of suboptimal validation of tissue tracking techniques, in order to advocate for this matter.

Indexed as

Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedCardiac Imaging TechniquesEchocardiography, Three-DimensionalFemaleHeart DiseasesHumansMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineMaleMyocardial ContractionReproducibility of ResultsSoftwareStroke VolumecMRechocardiographyfeature trackingreviewspeckle tracking imagingstraintagging

Identifiers

PMID30903139
PMCPMC6529912
OpenAlexW2946080087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.