Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30903109›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2019

High-resolution 3D imaging and analysis of axon regeneration in unsectioned spinal cord with or without tissue clearing.

Brett J Hilton, Oriane Blanquie, Andrea Tedeschi, Frank Bradke

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. In vivo programming of adult pericytes aids axon regeneration by providing cellular bridges for SCI repair.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mechanisms of Axon Growth and Regeneration: Moving between Development and Disease.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Brett J HiltonLaboratory for Axon Growth and Regeneration, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany. brett.hilton@dzne.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2813-2294
Oriane BlanquieLaboratory for Axon Growth and Regeneration, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany.
Andrea TedeschiLaboratory for Axon Growth and Regeneration, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany. andrea.tedeschi@osumc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9165-8013
Frank BradkeLaboratory for Axon Growth and Regeneration, German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, Germany. frank.bradke@dzne.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0345-3772

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here we present a protocol for analyses of axon regeneration and density in unsectioned adult mouse spinal cord. This includes methods for injury and tracing of dorsal column sensory and corticospinal axons; clearing and staining of unsectioned spinal cord; visualization of axon degeneration and regeneration in cleared and uncleared specimens using two-photon microscopy; and either manual or semi-automatic analysis of axon density and regeneration in 3D space using Imaris and ImageJ software. This protocol can be used to elucidate the molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying nervous system degeneration and regeneration and to establish the therapeutic efficacy of candidate neuroregenerative treatments. Because tissue sectioning is not required, this protocol enables unambiguous evaluation of regeneration and greatly accelerates the speed at which analyses can be conducted. Surgical procedures take <30 min per mouse, with a wait period of 2 weeks between axonal injury and tracing and 2-8 weeks between tracing and tissue processing. Clearing and immunolabeling take ~1-2 weeks, depending on the size of the sample. Imaging and analysis can be performed in 1 d. All these procedures can be accomplished by a competent graduate student or experienced technician.

Indexed as

AnimalsAxonsFemaleFuransImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMethylene ChlorideMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMicroscopy, Fluorescence, MultiphotonNerve RegenerationPhenyl EthersSoftwareSpinal CordSpinal Cord Injuriesdibenzyl etherFuransMethylene ChloridePhenyl Etherstetrahydrofuran

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.