Trial reportNeurology2019
Randomized trial of care management to improve Parkinson disease care quality.
Trial report in Neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01532986 (Improving Quality of Care in Parkinson's Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Improving Quality of Care in Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Effect of patient education interventions on non-motor symptoms and disease outcomes in parkinson's disease: a systematic review.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2025Pooled it
- Person-centred integrated care for people living with Parkinson's, Huntington's and Multiple Sclerosis: A systematic review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Pooled it
- Case management interventions in chronic disease reduce anxiety and depressive symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2023Pooled it
- The Role of Parkinson Nurses for Personalizing Care in Parkinson's Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of Parkinson's disease · 2022Pooled it
- Trial
- Effect of a Coordinated Community and Chronic Care Model Team Intervention vs Usual Care on Systolic Blood Pressure in Patients With Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: The SUCCEED Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2021Trial
- Stakeholder perceptions of components of a Parkinson disease care management intervention, care coordination for health promotion and activities in Parkinson's disease (CHAPS).BMC neurology · 2020Trial
- Quality and extent of implementation of a nurse-led care management intervention: care coordination for health promotion and activities in Parkinson's disease (CHAPS).BMC health services research · 2020Trial
- Mapping Long-Term Care Needs in Person-Centred Interventions for Older People with Multimorbidity: A WHO Framework-Guided Secondary Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- European Association for Palliative Care White Paper on spiritual care for people with neuro-oncological and neurodegenerative conditions: Integrative framework for practice, education, and research.Palliative & supportive care · 2026Review
- Novel Interdisciplinary Gastroenterology and Parkinson's Disease Clinic in a Parkinson's Center of Excellence.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2026Review
- The Treatment of Older Patients with Parkinson's Disease.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2025Review
- Holding back in communications with clinicians: Patient and care partner perspectives in Parkinson's disease.PEC innovation · 2024Article
- We Hope You're Listening: Qualitative Study of Advice Given by Individuals with Parkinson's Disease.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2024Article
- Breaking barriers in Parkinson's care: the multidisciplinary team approach.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2024Review
- The Relationship Between Religious Coping, Spirituality, and Disease Self-Management Among Parkinson's Patients in Turkey.Journal of religion and health · 2024Article
- Mixed-methods process evaluation of a proactive approach to healthcare in Parkinson's disease-ParkProReakt: a protocol of a hybrid efficacy-implementation study.BMJ neurology open · 2024Article
- Delivering Optimal Care to People with Cognitive Impairment in Parkinson's Disease: A Qualitative Study of Patient, Caregiver, and Professional Perspectives.Parkinson's disease · 2023Article
- More than medications: a patient-centered assessment of Parkinson's disease care needs during hospitalization.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo test effects on care quality of Chronic Care Model-based Parkinson disease (PD) management.
methodsThis 2-group stratified randomized trial involved 328 veterans with PD in southwestern United States. Guided care management, led by PD nurses, was compared to usual care. Primary outcomes were adherence to 18 PD care quality indicators. Secondary outcomes were patient-centered outcome measures. Data sources were telephone survey and electronic medical record (EMR). Outcomes were analyzed as intent-to-treat comparing initial and final survey and repeated-measures mixed-effects models.
resultsAverage age was 71 years; 97% of participants were male. Mean proportion of participants receiving recommended PD care indicators was significantly higher for the intervention than for usual care (0.77 vs 0.58) (mean difference 0.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.16, 0.22). Of 8 secondary outcomes, the only significant difference of the changes over time was in the positive Patient Health Questionnaire-2 depression screen for intervention minus usual care (-11.52 [95% CI -20.42, -2.62]).
conclusionA nurse-led chronic care management intervention, Care Coordination for Health Promotion and Activities in Parkinson's Disease (CHAPS), substantially increased adherence to PD quality of care indicators among veterans with PD, as documented in the EMR. Of 8 secondary outcomes assessed, a screening measure for depressive symptomatology was the only measure that was better in the intervention compared to usual care. More telephone calls in CHAPS were the only utilization difference over usual care. While CHAPS appears promising for improving PD care, additional iterative research is needed to refine the CHAPS model in routine clinical care so that it measurably improves patient-centered outcomes (NCT01532986). CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class I evidence that for patients with PD, CHAPS increased adherence to PD quality of care indicators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.